476
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Vermont has agreed to pay $175,000 to settle a lawsuit on behalf of a man who was charged with a crime for giving a state trooper the middle finger in 2018, the state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union said Wednesday. 

The lawsuit was filed in 2021 by the ACLU of Vermont on behalf of Gregory Bombard, of St. Albans. It says Bombard’s First Amendment rights were violated after an unnecessary traffic stop and retaliatory arrest in 2018.

Trooper Jay Riggen stopped Bombard’s vehicle in St. Albans on Feb. 9, 2018, because he believed Bombard had shown him the middle finger, according to the lawsuit. Bombard denied that but says he did curse and display the middle finger once the initial stop was concluded.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 88 points 1 week ago

This is settled law. It's been this way for a long time. Multiple people have had huge monetary settlements in multiple states for being arrested for flipping off a cop.

[-] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago

My father-in-law smiled and waved at a CHP cop when driving through California and got pulled over and told that was illegal, but was let off with a warning. Which I always thought was bullshit. Sounds like it is.

But the guy liked cops. He was literally just saying hi to a cop because he liked cops.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He was a white evangelical (but never preachy) Republican from Indiana who was born in 1931. So not even a boomer, someone who had kids who were boomers. He died loving cops. He didn't even hold it against that guy because he assumed he'd broken the law and was glad the nice cop let him off with a warning.

He was an old man and had some very archaic ideas about the world. When he was home, he watched old Westerns, sports, or Fox News. I assume he voted for Trump in 2016. But he was also super nice to everyone no matter who they were. He was just not a judgmental sort of guy on an individual level. He was the sort of person who would would have a friendly conversation to find out when the restaurant waiter got off their shift and what they were planning to do that day and said he hoped they had a good time doing it.

So he probably (I never asked) believed in the "gay agenda," but would also be happy to have a friendly chat with some people hanging outside a gay bar if he happened to walked by and saw that people were standing there. Even if he knew it was a gay bar.

[It's his birthday today, so he's been on my mind.]

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

That's really nice.

We've also lost a lot of this, which is a shame.

I'd love to be part of bringing back being able to disagree with people on issues but still treat each other well. Like people.

I do try to remember to try. We all should.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

That's the biggest thing this country is missing right now. It's OK to disagree with other people, but for some reason, people seem to think they are enemies because they disagree. We are all individuals, with our own views on everything. There isn't a single person in the world that I agree with 100% on everything. To assume that anyone I disagree with is somehow evil, or my enemy, is insane.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

for some reason

Definitely one major reason has been that there's been an incredibly effective propaganda machine constantly telling people that's the case. It started taking off in the 90s.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Part of the problem, and I don't remember who summed it up this way but it's as accurate a description as I've ever seen, is that the conservative mindset is exactly this: "I'm allowed to tell you what to do, but you are not allowed to tell me what to do."

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

You mean the conservatives trying to make me and others illegal and shined from society? I should just agree to disagree?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Happy Birthday, Flying Squid Sr (in-law). 🎂

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

In-law. Not my dad. Although they were both born in 1931 coincidentally. Both no longer with us unfortunately.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

"Do you know why I pulled you over?"

"Idk because you're butthurt?"

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Imma gonna go flip off some cops and get rich

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Or die trying. Be careful you dont get the road rage ranger.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Gotta keep my kin fed

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah but cops don't care about the law.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Cops are government employees, and hopefully the government cares about losing $175k over bullshit their employee did.

Yeah, they can afford to lose one or two, but if we all start flipping off cops and start getting charged, it's going to add up.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Historically? No, not really. Arpiao was losing millions of dollars for his contracted cities before they started dropping contracts with him and forcing Maricopa County Sheriff's Office to operate only in unincorporated areas.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Ironic how if something is your job to care about, that it often leads to the opposite reality. Sure, cops are especially shitty but I have a lot of lax coworkers. Feels very common

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
476 points (98.6% liked)

News

21741 readers
3352 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS