this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
615 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3630 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House and Democratic members of Congress called Georgia Republican’s comparison a ‘compliment’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Honestly, does he even need campaigning? Like since when did you read a political ad or billboard and was like "hmm my mind has officially changed". Most of people's mind has already been made up. He could really sit there and not do anything and end up winning.

Edit: yeah. We need every fighting chance we get. Release the dark brandon memes.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After 2016, I would not be so complacent. Never underestimate the stupidity and goldfish-like memory of the average American.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

When I heard Trump won the Republican nomination in 2016 I literally laughed out loud thinking there is absolutely no way, 0% chance, better odds that the sun will explode, this country is pretty stupid but not THAT stupid. And sure enough, I was wrong. That was when I realized that the GOP is very, very good at manipulating stupid people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing you didn't consider there is that there's like 100% chance the sun will explode. Probably not any time soon, but eventually

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Our sun is not massive enough to go nova. It will expand into a red giant and then contract into a white dwarf.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I need my coffee to process this lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

And here I was, groaning when Hilary won the primary, because I knew Trump had a good chance against her. People thought I was over reacting, but literally anyone would have been a better opponent to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't underestimate decades of getting people to subconsciously hate Hillary Clinton and what that does to voters. Many hated her. Few actually had a reason when asked

There's a reason the GOP goes so hard at AOC in 2020+. They see her as a real threat to the presidency in 2040+ and they want decades of demonization in the bank

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@Saneless @RandallFlagg The Conservatives in #Canada do the same repetitive attacks on #Trudeau and are having some success- many cite a hate for Trudeau but when asked why they have literally no reason- unfortunate so many want to be told what to think rather then vetting information- critical thinking needs to be a value not a nuisance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Sbhinclusion @Saneless @RandallFlagg The hate is that their assumptions and privileges are being called out. That these no longer protect and isolate them from the world’s problems. They hate that they must make hard decisions that effect themselves and the ones they love. They hate that they are vulnerable. It’s new and it’s ugly and they consider it unfair. Saying F*ck has never solved a problem

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Sbhinclusion @Saneless @RandallFlagg When asked why they hate Trudeau, people often site absolute lies that are repeated continuously by Conservatives and happily repeated by mainstream media.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's definitely not unique to Canada unfortunately

Even in local politics we have idiots here who are blaming "out of state corporate interests" for wanting to vote yes for a bill

MF the only reason you're parroting that shit is because of the corporate interests who bribe the politicians who tell you want to think

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm fairly certain that part of the Cambridge Analytica data manipulation scandal thing was that they managed to throw an election by targeting users on the fence and susceptible to the "I don't need to vote" or the "voting doesn't matter" type comments and memes.
They targeted their client's opposition's voters with these, caused a really low turnout of voters in that demographic, allowing their client to win.

Don't get sucked into these things.
Vote how you want, even if it's just the uninspiring, boring, lesser evil, whatever.