this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
342 points (87.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

29860 readers
511 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zeppo 50 points 5 months ago (3 children)

How else would one interpret it?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 5 months ago (5 children)

It's not really that I interpret it in another way, but I never really thought about the structure of the word πŸ˜…

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Go further. For example, people say 'gypped' without knowing it's a pejorative reference to the word 'Gypsy' which is itself a pejorative of the Romani.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My favorite recently is sophist from the pejorative Platonic definition. It really puts words like sophisticated in a different etymological light and subtle contextual meaning.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophist_(dialogue)

Fake but convincing by argument, gaslighting, etc., generally by someone in a position like a professor, a judge, or a politician.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I remember learning this about 20ish years ago and telling my then-sister in law about it when I explained why I wasn't going to use it anymore. I got told I had a stick up my ass, and this was by a marginalized (gay, immigrant) woman. (Somewhat unrelated note - very grateful she's a former relation.)

So glad people have been learning and I've been hearing "gypped" less and less in recent years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Some words have simply entered common use and become decoupled from their former meaning. Maybe your acquaintance was right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Watching my own language means my "acquaintance" was right? I don't think I'm the one with a stick, if that's the case.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Seems like Orwell was right

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

And the Egyptians, too!

[–] Zeppo 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’ve had similar realizations about words like β€œacross” and β€œagain”.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I get "across", but what about again?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

A gain. In addition to.

[–] Zeppo 4 points 5 months ago

β€œA gain” as in one more. Gain meaning β€œan increase in amount”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, actually I had never thought about the structure of the word either. Thanks for the great shower thought!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I've definitely had a similar feeling with band names and brand names, etc. You're just so used to hearing them that they are their own thing without being the component words that the name contains.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago
[–] agamemnonymous 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think the pronunciation, specifically the blending of the end of "upside" and beginning of "down", turns it into one of those compound words that your brain interprets as an independent word, rather than a combination of its composite parts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Unused to wonder if the radio announcers that are always reciting the station call letters found that the letters stopped sounding like individual sounds, and the whole recitation became a sort of "word" for them. Like "You're listening to 102.9FM WBLM!" Did it stop being "double-you bee ell emm," and turn into more of a mashup of "dubbleyabeeyelmm"?

True, the difference is pretty subtle, especially to a listener, but I wonder strange things sometimes...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

As a fellow wonderer of strange things, all I have to say is keep wondering, my friend :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I think this is the case for a lot of words. It ceases to be a combination of words and it's just one word. Then in the shower you break it down and ohhh.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zeppo 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Yes! So glad someone else though of this 😎