this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
1301 points (99.3% liked)
People Twitter
5301 readers
846 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Behold, I am both of you: I liked it and I thought it was kinda shit ๐
Right? Like it has its moments of good and bad. I mean it's not an Oscar winner, but it wasn't so bad that I lost interest.
Tbh I thought JLo did a pretty good job.
Damn JLo was my main reason not to watch, historically she's just not that great. But if she pulled it off or made it kinda self-aware I'll check it out.
65 is also really good.
Well it's still JLo. If you aren't much a fan you won't be too impressed. Imo she can be fairly one directional in her movies.
That said, when I watch a movie that has heavy CGI I try and take a step back throughout the movie from all the special effects and evaluate an actors performance.
Ya ok sounds pretentious, but I try to imagine the environment they are in when acting. It's basically nothing but a green box, with someone off to the side reading lines.
If they can give a fairly believable performance I'm impressed, because we see all the special effects, editing, direction and production. The actor has to imagine it, and hope they don't look like a dumbass in post.
65 was alright. Wanted more dinosaurs though lol