this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
1301 points (99.3% liked)
People Twitter
5301 readers
846 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Damn JLo was my main reason not to watch, historically she's just not that great. But if she pulled it off or made it kinda self-aware I'll check it out.
65 is also really good.
Well it's still JLo. If you aren't much a fan you won't be too impressed. Imo she can be fairly one directional in her movies.
That said, when I watch a movie that has heavy CGI I try and take a step back throughout the movie from all the special effects and evaluate an actors performance.
Ya ok sounds pretentious, but I try to imagine the environment they are in when acting. It's basically nothing but a green box, with someone off to the side reading lines.
If they can give a fairly believable performance I'm impressed, because we see all the special effects, editing, direction and production. The actor has to imagine it, and hope they don't look like a dumbass in post.
65 was alright. Wanted more dinosaurs though lol