Political Memes

5605 readers

1279 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1385

TikTok resurfaces video of Trump saying US shouldn't have a president with felony conviction (cdn.jwplayer.com)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

163 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Trump in 2016:

She shouldn't be allowed to run.
If she were to win this election, it would create an unprecedented constitutional crisis.
In that situation we could very well have a sitting president under felony indictment and ultimately a criminal trial.
It would grind the government to a halt.

Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/donald-trump-trial-guilty-hillary-clinton-b2556563.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Expecting an obvious criminal to face some justice and maybe not be put in charge again… that’s reactionary?

Please learn to read before insulting people. I said the "only way the lib left could make the reactionary right reject Trump..." Obviously, I was calling right-wingers who support Trump reactionary. You call me a goon, but you're illiterate. So really, maybe you shouldn't be insulting people.

[–] Banana 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Dude, you came barrelling into this comment section already angry and ready for a fight.

[+] [email protected] -6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What's your point? That I came here willing to argue with you caused lingh0e to fail a basic reading comprehension check?

You people engage in insults and tone-policing because you're mindless NPCs whose politics is based entirely on group identification and you're not actually capable of making real arguments. None of you can actually dig down into your belief system and justify it from first principles, nor do any of you have any real grasp of the intellectual underpinnings of your beliefs, nor are you cognizant of the history that has brought us to this point. You're just screeching monkeys, flinging shit at things because you're emotionally agitated. None of you actually thinks. That's why lingh0e reacted with rage to a comment they didn't even parse correctly, and it's why you think I came here "angry" (you're projecting your own emotions onto me).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You people engage in insults and tone-policing because... (Immediately resumes their insults and tone policing from other posts)

It's always projection.

[–] Banana 5 points 6 months ago

Dude, come on. You were criticizing the -- in your mind monolithic -- left of getting angry too easily when you waltzed in here already pissed, hoping to make some "libtards" angry and prove your point. But you were the one that came in here pissed. You really owned the libs with that one bud.

There is no reason to have a real discussion with you because you never came in here for a discussion. That was never your intention and that is very clear.