this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
127 points (97.0% liked)

News

22869 readers
4233 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I agree. That the congressional immigration reform that I mentioned. Only Congress can increase the budget. Biden repealed Title 42 and left the border open while pressing Congress for that exact legislation. They haven’t legislated a full reform since 1986. The reform passed in 2019 was for minors and an amendment tied to border security. Trump twisted the mandatory acceptance for minors into Title 42, detaining them while deporting their parents.

https://guides.loc.gov/latinx-civil-rights/irca

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6

So with congressional reform options aside, what do you think Biden should do?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He could not actively make it worse by implementing counterproductive limitations.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You’re vaguely stating what he shouldn’t do. Which of his three options do you think is best? Turn away, detain, or nothing and overcrowd sanctuary cities with homeless migrants?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Biden wouldn't be overcrowding sanctuary cities, that would be the result of obstruction in congress.

That is also the least worst thing he could do, nothing at all. All of the other options are worse because of congressional obstruction.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It’s not about blame, it’s about resources. If a sanctuary city states they’re at capacity, they no longer can provide housing for the migrants.

Doing nothing results in following existing immigration policy. Migrants would be bused from border cities to sanctuary cities. Without housing, the migrants would be homeless in the overcrowded sanctuary cities. Are you suggesting that’s the better option for migrants, or suggesting he does it to deflect the blame back on to Congress?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Releasing that pressure by denying migrants the proper asylum process means that the problem can be ignored for longer instead of the sanctuary cities applying more pressure for actual change.

This is a counterproductive band aid.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They’ve been asking for support since last year. Congress failed to pass a bill.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Republucans obstructed the bill they asked for. It will take longer than a year to overcome that hurdle.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s been almost forty years since comprehensive immigration reform was passed. The problem is Congress, not POTUS. Biden only has the three options I mentioned above.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He has a fourth option to do nothing about it because that is better than those three options. Sometimes doing nothing is better than doing something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Doing nothing is the same as overcrowding sanctuary cities. Doing nothing defaults to current immigration policy of busing migrants from border cities to sanctuary cities. They have no housing, so the migrants would be homeless. Allowing them to get housing elsewhere requires an act of Congress. Those are literally his options.