this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
97 points (94.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43138 readers
1636 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Paul Verhoeven really upped the ante on that one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

How would Hannah Arendt be relevant here? I read a short blurb about her philosophy especially in regards to authority but I haven't seen starship troopers

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A hexbear or lemmygrad user could better explain this one, but its a deep-cut satirical comment on how nations that market themselves as "free" (but aren't), promote philosophies that group and demonize all their enemies into a single camp, and prop up writers like Arendt, who was one of the main ideological peddlers of western moral supremacy during the cold war.

Losurdo has a lot of good articles on this and Arendt specificaly, and also Gabriel Rockhill has some good articles about this too.

https://ia801609.us.archive.org/0/items/pdfy-dfBD-isycOcvHvqS/Domenico%20Losurdo%20--%20Towards%20a%20Critique%20of%20the%20Category%20of%20Totalitarianism.pdf

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ahhh, thank you. I'll give that link a read

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No probs! I also recorded that one recently as an audiobook here. torrent link is also there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

as an audiobook here.

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Im subbed to your youtube lol, thanks for the think though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I recently started reading Eichmann In Jerusalem, because I was aware it introduced the phrase "banality of evil" and always think of that in moral/ethical discussions about the real world (versus hypotheticals), and was immediately struck by how uncritical she was of zionism when it crops up in her reporting/writing. It's almost like just a quirk of some of the heads of state that is used to explain their politics, rather than anything with more sinister implications.

Perhaps this comes from some immature SJW-ish ideal that an author should always negatively represent harmful ideas—or maybe she does later and I'm just impatient—but it still strikes me as ironic that in the seminal work on The Banality of Evil, genocidal colonialism is treated as, well, banal.

[–] nahuse 1 points 2 months ago

I’d interpret it as a nod to so much of her work being about the rise of fascism and totalitarianism, and the irony of having a poster of such a figure given the fascist government in Starship Troopers.