Political Memes

5534 readers

2109 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

616

It's okay, tankies love fascism, so they're not put out by the result (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

561 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

doesn’t stop Very Serious Leftists™ from parroting it over and over and over again.

Wait a minute - does 'ad hominem', to you, mean 'someone said something mean about me'?

Is that what you're saying?

By the way, you’re still refusing to address my point about why Biden won’t do what he demands from others…

About why he won't give up 'a principle' that is currently popular amongst the majority of Americans, including a majority of Democrats, to appeal to a minority of voters, who are not even particularly reliable voters at that?

Huh. I guess it's a mystery why a politician in a democratic system wouldn't do that.

I guess we'll never know.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

All of them are similar to the general scheme of ad hominem argument, that is instead of dealing with the essence of someone's argument or trying to refute it, the interlocutor is attacking the character of the proponent of the argument and concluding that it is a sufficient reason to drop the initial argument.

Don't worry, sweetheart, I addressed your argument just fine; that you want to play tone police is on you. :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Now you're ad-homineming me as if I was that other guy you were having a fight with. If your refutation is sound, why do you need to attack someone's character anyway?

[–] UrPartnerInCrime -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

People who come into the middle of a fight and are surprised they got punched are the worse.

In case you can't read between the lines, that means you

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm surprised you can't tell people apart, not that you'll lash out any which way

[–] UrPartnerInCrime 0 points 6 months ago

You do know I'm not the original person you were fighting, right?

I just came in