Technology

60084 readers

2193 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

590

Report: Microsoft to face antitrust case over Teams (arstechnica.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

128 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Eh, it works pretty well in our org. We use it for almost all of our meetings, and we have pretty much no issues. Then again, our entire team is on macOS and we have it integrated at the corporate level (so meeting rooms and whatnot use it), and it's a pretty solid experience.

My main complaints are:

chats absolutely suck
seems to use a bunch of resources
people we interview seem to have issues (I'm guessing the webapp sucks?)

We use Slack for text communication and impromptu video chats, so the chat issues don't bother me all that much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

so your main complaints are that its most basic usecase sucks, but it works quite well. which is it?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Chats are not the most basic use case for Teams, meetings are. And meetings work pretty well.