this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
50 points (83.8% liked)

News

22876 readers
3812 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, that's arguably a bad move in terms of international relations and maybe he shouldn't have said that, but...he's also not really wrong. Japan's demographic situation is serious, and the Japanese government has been trying to get the public to accept more immigration for a while and been running into friction.

To some extent, they can help mitigate an aging society with relatively-many retired people relying on relatively-few working people by trying to increase labor force participation, and I know that they've done that too -- trying to get more women working and pushing back the retirement age:

https://hrmasia.com/japan-approves-law-raising-retirement-age-to-70/

Japan approves law raising retirement age to 70

But that can only go so far; having the total fertility rate as low as it is in Japan creates pretty substantial issues.

And it might be better to lead by example here. In the last few years our own total fertility rate has fallen as well. We do better there than pretty much all developed countries, but in general, if you're going to run a lower total fertility rate, you're gonna have to make up for it somehow.

We've had a history of running very high immigration levels compared to most countries, but we're currently at a comparatively low level relative to our own history:

In the decade ending in 2020, we saw a lower population growth than any other decade in the history of the country, at 7.4%. Until 1870, there wasn't a decade where we didn't grow less than 30% in a decade:

https://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h980.html

https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/12/us-population-grew-in-2021-slowest-rate-since-founding-of-the-nation.html

IIRC some countries, like Canada and Australia are running higher per-capita rates.

googles

Yeah.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_by_immigrant_and_emigrant_population

15.4% of the US population is immigrant.

21.3% of the Canadian population.

30% of the Australian population.

For 2023:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_by_net_migration_rate

United States: 3.0 people per 1000 population in 2023

Canada: 5.4 people per 1000 population in 2023

Australia: 6.4 people per 1000 population in 2023

Some EU member states are also up there, like Belgium, but that's due in significant part to internal EU population movement; it doesn't deal with EU demographic issues in aggregate, if one is to deal with them in aggregate, as there's also outflow of people from member states with low fertility, like Bulgaria. I kind of wish that Eurostat would start aggregating statistics for the EU as a whole on things like immigration and import/export numbers. They could publish those alongside the individual member state numbers, could do both at once.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If the US wants to increase the birth rate they should make this country one that’s worth bringing children into.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You'll create slaves and you'll like it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

The 1% are really asking for a French Revolution response here.