this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
185 points (97.4% liked)

World News

38970 readers
2391 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Senate voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday night to give final approval to a $95.3 billion package of aid to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, sending it to President Biden and ending months of uncertainty about whether the United States would continue to back Kyiv in its fight against Russian aggression.

The vote reflected resounding bipartisan support for the measure, which passed the House on Saturday by lopsided margins after a tortured journey on Capitol Hill, where it was nearly derailed by right-wing resistance. The Senate’s action, on a vote of 79 to 18, provided a victory for the president, who had urged lawmakers to move quickly so he could sign it into law.

And it capped an extraordinary political saga that raised questions about whether the United States would continue to play a leading role in upholding the international order and projecting its values globally.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Damn. While I don’t mind TikTok going bye bye. I don’t like mixing it with other bills.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Mixing support to Israel with the same bill as support to ukraine was a nasty move too. Is it just to save time? It makes no sense that they would do that

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's because the Republicans wouldn't let a bill, that only supports Ukraine, pass. So this was a compromise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So it is a if we do this, you have to do that, kind of thing?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

The (Rep.) speaker Mike Johnson went against the MAGAs and worked together with the Democrats to get it passed.
But I doubt they would have gotten enough votes if they didn't bundle it with the aid for Israel and the TikTok ban.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's done under the guise of saving time, but obviously people group things strategically. "Rubber stamp all of the things from Congress this week... And don't worry about the tiny bill fund a black op that's in there".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

But the only time they save is at vote casting and it would take almost no more time to cast a vote on 3 bills than on 1

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But didn't they have three separate votes, one on each?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

In ~~Congress~~ the House Of Representatives. I don't think the did in the senate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's because both of them serve the same US foreign policy goals. The ethics of one over the other don't factor in to it at all.