this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
821 points (98.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54698 readers
389 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In what appears to be an escalating incursion into a user’s digital privacy, a collective of film companies continue to implore the court to compel Reddit to surrender its users’ personal details. This move is part of an ongoing piracy liability case against Internet Service Providers. Reddit, however, steadfastly resists, staunchly defending its users’ rights to anonymous speech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc 113 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The film companies have singled out a Reddit user, “xBROKEx,” citing a 12-year-old comment admitting to pirating the movie The Expendables.

Reddit counters that this attempted breach of privacy is unwarranted, given that the statute of limitations for copyright infringement is just three years.

How ridiculous. Someone admitted / bragged / bullshitted on the Internet 12 years ago. The statute of limitations expired 9 years ago. But, the film companies are still trying to get the information on a poor xBROKEx.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Could the selection be intentional? A silly unenforceable case to open the door for a more comprehensive invasion of privacy on platforms to make discussion and hosting discussion of piracy into a riskier endeavor?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is what I'm thinking. This is just a case of them seeing how far they can take it. Once precedent is set they can start to litigate based on a user merely mentioning that they pirated a movie.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Could be that they're seeking exhaustion so that can push more of their privacy breaking bullshit in international trade agreements.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Exactly what the trick is. Once the precedent is set, they can exploit the hell out of it.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a ridiculous case. You can't prove anything based on a comment made online. Defence will just be "i just said that to sound cool, I've never pirated anything and wouldn't know how" probably doesn't even need a lawyer as there's no evidence.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh fuck that. If those type of words are spoken in court you better have a lawyer or it's going to be twisted against you with some sort of proof that you do in fact know how to pirate stuff. Straight to jail.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup. They will use the fact that a user said they pirated a movie as a starting point. If Reddit capitulated and handed over the user info that could be used to hunt for more evidence and possibly connect them to other pirates. It would open a juicy can of worms for these bottom feeders. Good on Reddit for standing up for their users.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"Good on reddit for standing up for their users" I mean, you can't abuse them for cash if they're in jail.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

But what for? His guilt expired years ago.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

even knowing it will be thrown out, the companies want to go after them. they want to hurt xBROKEx as much as they can, as an example to others that you'll never get away with it. That they'll hound you decades later.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's the thing. Even though xBROKEx would probably win in court, it would bankrupt them in lawyer fees.