this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
1015 points (98.0% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4357 readers
29 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 188 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Google photos and apple have been doing it for years too, they’re like we found this person 50 times in your photo collection, why don’t you name them?

[–] [email protected] 73 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Apple, afaik, used to be doing this on-device rather than in the cloud. Not quite sure about the situation today.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don’t. Corps gonna corp, if they can. But I’ve checked this using all the development, networking, and energy monitoring tools at my disposal and apple’s e2e and on-device guarantee does appear to hold. For now.

Still, those who can should audit periodically, even if they’re only doing it for the settlement.

[–] brbposting 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Security is in my interest, but yw

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They were inferencing a cnn on a mobile device? I have no clue but that would be costly battery wise at least.

[–] didnt_readit 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

They’ve been doing ML locally on devices for like a decade. Since way before all the AI hype. They’ve had dedicated ML inference cores in their chips for a long time too which helps the battery life situation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It couldn’t quite be a decade, a decade ago we only just had the vgg — but sure, broad strokes, they’ve been doing local stuff, cool.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

This is why it's worth the time to set up Immich.

It even has the same kind of AI object and face recognition as in Google Photos, but it's your own cloud setup and self-hosted software, so all of the data is entirely yours and nobody else's. It's downright strange to think of those things as actual features and not privacy violations.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah it really bothers me that they’re not asking you to compromise only your data, they want you to give them info on your friends/family too (who obviously didn’t agree to the terms and conditions). Thanks for shouting out an alternative.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Amazon asked me to use their photos app to get a $20 gift certificate last week. I uploaded one photo, got the bonus money, deleted the app and used it to help buy a new monitor.

Sometimes these things can be turned into a win.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

So what you are saying is that you gave Amazon access to your device for 20$? Doesn't sound like a good deal to me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

and what would "access to your device" be (assuming this is android)?

[–] MajorSauce 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Quick guess from me would be permission to use the camera(s) and if they have some kind of file picker or gallery, permission to access all media files from your phone (and older versions of Android did not have this "media"distinction, so they would give access to all user files (excluding sandboxed paths)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You have to manually approve of giving each permission on Android, and camera and files/images are separate permissions (so giving access to the camera doesn't require giving access to your files). And you can make it so they only have access to it while you use the app. If you take a random picture and then uninstall, they get nothing except that random picture.

[–] MajorSauce 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Indeed, and would you like to take a guess what % of Android user just accepts it as it is?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Presumably not anyone on Lemmy

[–] priapus 6 points 10 months ago

apps are sandboxed. if all they did was upload one pic, what access did amazon really get? I'd do that for $20.