Hawk

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah it's great! Check it out.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

IPSC is common around the world.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My favourite part of threaded platforms is the arbitrary and tangential discourse

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

In my research group we could tell instantly and it would usually act as a mark against the paper (ie read this one later).

If you're reading a lot of papers it becomes apparent.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Half-baked is a bit unkind. Sway is quite performant, stable and lean.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Well that's good to know because I had some terrible luck with it about a decade ago. Although I don't think I would go back to windows, I just don't need it for work anymore and it's become far too complex.

I've also had pretty bad luck with BTRFS though, although it seems to have improved a lot in the past 3 years that I've been using it.

ZFS would be good but having to rebuild the kernel module is a pain in the ass because when it fails to build you're unbootable (on root). I also don't like how clones are dependant on parents, requires a lot of forethought when you're trying to create a reproducible build on eg Gentoo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I gotcha:

  • Btrfs
    • BTree File System
      • A Copy on White file system that supports snapshots, supported mostly by
  • ZFS
    • Zetabyte File System
      • Copy on Write File System. Less flexible than BTRFS but generally more robust and stable. Better compression in my experience than BTRFS. Out of Kernel Linux support and native FreeBSD.
  • HFS+
    • what Mac uses, I have no clue about this. some Copy on Write stuff.
  • NTFS
    • Windows File System
    • From what I know, no compression or COW
    • In my experience less stable than ext4/ZFS but maybe it's better nowadays.
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

HFS+ has a different features set than NTFS or ext4, Apple elect to store metadata that way.

I would imagine modern FS like ZFS or btrfs could benefit from doing something similar but nobody has chosen to implement something like that in that way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey, I'm not that invested here. It's cool, we're good.

I don't have a horse in this race.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yeah man, look I'm sorry you feel that way. I wish you all the best.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

You are very hostile. I'm not sure what your problem is.

There is no argument to be had here. We've both expressed the same points and we are agreeing.

Touch grass man. Life is good.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Get a life man.

view more: next ›