this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
143 points (95.5% liked)

Games

16861 readers
1225 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There's also questions around the game industry as a whole. I think the recent layoffs at major companies aren't just another cycle, but systemic. The market no longer bears production of giant games with crazy graphics that cost $70 and have a bunch of DLC and gambling mechanics attached.

Games won't go away, but they'll play fine on something like the Steam Deck, Switch 2, or modest gaming PC. What would high end console hardware bring to the table anymore?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Graphics are no longer a major selling point in most cases. Most people would be fine with a good game that works and isn't saddle with microtransactions, even if it means it will look somewhat worse.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Consoles themselves are a source of microtransactions. Just look at how much money you have to spend to have online play.

Guess how much it costs on Steam. Come on... guess!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I wouldn't say graphics have zero bearing for sales but the scales have definitely tipped towards gameplay over the last several years. Minecraft added rtx graphics and the mass majority of people, even with rtx capable cards, just yawned.

Digital game sales, outside of sports titles, are pushed by streaming engagement and riding coat tails of previous games. Look at the recent history and it's pretty obvious.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Switch 2 will be underpowered and boring.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm saying the Switch 2 does not need power, because nothing will be pushing graphics so hard anymore.

[–] Pika 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

the switch 2 IMO needs a power upgrade for sure, my switch 1 struggled to actually play higher ended games, and the actual graphic quality on those games wern't bad but not the great either.

Nintendon't Rant

That being said, I decided recently that Nintendon't is a company that doesn't need my money, between the actively hostile acts to its fan generated content with the shut down of third party non-profit games, it's prosecution of Gary Bowser(which was the extent of charging a sales associate for the entire companies fraud) and it's downright abusive treatment of the right to repair and archival/emulation communities. They are basically the Apple of the game development world. I won't spend money on their stuff anymore.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Current switch needs to stream current and last gen games, they will still need power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Switch 2 is likely to be around the power level of a PS4, which is good enough for this hypothetical.