this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
150 points (95.2% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

4799 readers
664 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd like to see an LLM get clear and non-conflicting requirements from a customer. It will probably nuke the planet in frustration.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the only real use for AI today is with human oversight. Like, have it wrote your essay/code/business plan, but review it for actual use in the world. It can do something 75% accurate and add the knowledge of a competent human and you have 1 person doing the job of 4 people. It realistically 3 people since review takes time. This doesn't address the ethics of doing this, but is the only realistic way of using it in Mar 2024.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

That's how I've been using it: Like a sous chef.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's kind of my job and it's hard to find people that do it well.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's hard across the industry. You need to basically be a therapist with technical knowledge.

"Tell me how you feel when you think about processing expense reports. Do you feel that the approval checkbox be checked or unchecked?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'd like to see an LLM get clear and non-conflicting requirements from a customer.

Are you "a people person"?