[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Every once in a while, you can refresh your memory by reading the man page.

Or if, like me, you use Emacs, Magit exposes everything quite clearly.

[-] [email protected] 97 points 4 months ago

Antisemitism to Palestinian support is like misandry to feminism. Yeah, some people might be guilty of it (and those who are, misunderstand the latter ideologies), but it's way overrepresented in opposing media, who is often guilty of such issues itself.

[-] [email protected] 71 points 5 months ago

We need laws mandating respect of robots.txt. This is what happens when you don’t codify stuff

[-] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago

Everything is reverse-engineered, and different people work on different stuff. It’s not like the resources devoted to OpenGL could be diverted to microphone support, that’s a completely different skill set.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Slowly?

(Don’t forget Israel!)

50
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Many Lemmy instances have "feddit" in their name. Is that just "federated reddit" or am I missing something?

[-] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

Why would anyone identify by their political ideology? Or worse, by a single party??

[-] [email protected] 49 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This isn't a new discovery, is it? People already know about this, it's been like this for years. This has always been one of Netanyahu's many criticisms, even at home.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago

I mean, both Hamas and Israeli leadership should be prosecuted for war crimes

I just think this situation shouldn't have even been reached in the first place...

[-] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

This war really makes you hate Britain (and possibly France) for causing unrest in the first place

[-] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

The Israeli government doesn't even represent all Israelis, let alone all Jews. Does represent the vast majority unfortunately

10
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I wanted to ask everything in one post instead of multiple, so I divide this one.

Shards and Vessels

It's known that a Shard's Intent eventually overpowers the agency of the vessel. It's mentioned in the Stormlight epigraphs that Ati, the vessel of Ruin, was once a kind man.

I've been wondering about this process. Does the amount of time it takes for the vessel to lose agency depend on the shard and the vessel? For example:

  • If the new vessel is already a sliver of the same shard, will they lose agency faster?
  • If the new vessel is already a sliver of a shard with opposing intent, will they lose agency slower?
  • If a vessel (as in the case of Sazed) holds two shards with opposing intents, are they able to maintain their personality forever, the different intents "cancelling out"?
  • Do shards that seek change (Ruin, Endowment, Cultivation) in the most general way influence their vessel faster than the more passive intents (Preservation, Honor) who want to maintain?

Do the 16 shards divide neatly into eight pairs of opposing shards? I think we've only seen Ruin and Preservation as complete opposites, though it could be argued that Devotion/Dominion also works.

If a person held all the shards (assuming the Splintered ones are somehow fixed, and that no one managed to stop them in the process), what would happen? How about holding all the dawnshards as well? Would any mortal being be able to handle such a great amount of investiture?

What level of control, if any, does a shard have over their associated magic system? Could Sazed decide to "turn off" allomancy for the day?

Related somewhat, what shards is surgebinding associated with? It looks like it can be performed with any one of Stormlight, Voidlight and Lifelight. Does surgebinding with one of these constitute a separate magic system? If so, what actually are the Surges? If not, what's common to Honor, Cultivation, and Odium?

The Metallic Arts

In Allomancy, the metal that is burned is not the actual source of the power (investiture), but rather a key which determines which kind of investiture is drawn from Preservation.

The Lost MetalWe've seen in era 2 that Allomancers can also draw upon alternative sources of investiture, such as the Dor and whatever Autonomy's portal is made out of.

This is all fine for Mistings, but how can Mistborn (or Hemalurgists) decide which ability they want, if they have no metals?

In Allomancy, even non-Allomancers can burn the God Metals, whereas in Feruchemy, unkeyed nicrosil seems to be the only kind of metalmind that non-Feruchemists can access. Why is this?

And, when saying that anyone can burn God Metals, what does "anyone" mean? Is it any living creature who can digest them? Or do they have to be Scadrians, having some of Preservation's own investiture in themselves?
Ditto for Feruchemical nicrosil.

Can a Rosharan human (the species existed before the Shattering) burn lerasium or drain nicrosil?

Why

The Lost Metaldid Harmony make Wax and Wayne burn some lerasium instead of making them Mistborn directly, as with Spook
?

And lastly, is the cosmere-wide story arc just Autonomy and Odium being jerks to everyone?

[-] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago

Fine, but, like, don't recommend Vivaldi. Also, if you disable the Brave ads, you're not really supporting them, while still getting the benefits.

— Sent from Librewolf

[-] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

Use whatever you want. But do consider if you want to contribute to Google's monopoly, and if you want to use an open-source browser.

  • Vivaldi Browser is not open source. Better use Brave than that…
  • If you still really hate Firefox, Ungoogled Chromium which is basically Chrome with all the Google stuff removed.
  • All of the above do still contribute to Google's monopoly, so I would really encourage Firefox or a fork.
  • Barring that, you could also get away with a WebKit browser (like GNOME web, Nyxt). Although WebKit is developed by Apple, it's still open source and doesn't look particularly bad. If you're on a Mac, Safari is an option, but it's closed source.
view more: next ›

ytg

joined 11 months ago