threeganzi

joined 2 years ago
[–] threeganzi 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] threeganzi 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] threeganzi 2 points 3 days ago
[–] threeganzi 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I didn’t find the information on the linked website though. I’m sure it’s there, and I want to read about it. Can someone direct me to the specific page or some other source?

[–] threeganzi 1 points 4 days ago (4 children)

It might be in there somewhere but I could not find it. I don’t necessarily doubt it, but would be nice with a less biased source than the lawyer of Luigi. Any news article that can sum up the legal problem of the evidence.

[–] threeganzi 2 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Any source on this claim?

[–] threeganzi 3 points 2 weeks ago

Not necessarily. It does prove that it legally should be optional.

[–] threeganzi 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The fact that there was a high profile case might indicate that it’s not as trivially optional as you make it seem.

[–] threeganzi 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My guess is they want clean and aligned data to train AI. They’ll save time and money by getting people in line early, or banning those that don’t follow their rules.

[–] threeganzi 16 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Doesn’t matter, your life will be ruined either way by everyone around you that wants a piece of the pie.

Life pro tip: don’t win the jack pot. And if you do, keep it as much a secret as possible.

[–] threeganzi 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would I take an article serious when the author is calling them self Tyler Durden.

[–] threeganzi 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Not sure if your sarcastic but why not give it all to consumers and let the them boost the economy which in turn create jobs?

view more: next ›