Nobody is sabotaging new technology, some of them are just crap all on their own and AI certainly falls into that category.
Your mistake is to ignore the 90% of "new technology" that never got anywhere. "new" doesn't automatically mean that it is useful and will succeed much in the same way that "old" doesn't automatically mean it is reliable and has been used for a good reason.
The problem is that the picture does not represent what they want. They want aspects a, b and c from the picture while someone else looking at it might see aspects x, y and z. Pictures are an incredibly imprecise form of communication.
Hydrogen is an absolute pain to store and transport and all the practical hydrogen production methods are dirty right now. It just isn't even a real option even after years of development.
More like a dictator groupie
It is worse. People can't even fix AI so it gets better at a task.
Gold is actually useful so it will never lose all value.
There are a few politicians who wrote their own (e.g. Churchill) but usually there is some sort of agenda involved in terms of how they want the world to see them.
The headline makes it sound a bit as if they are talking about a random person from the French region of Brittany.
He looks like the kind of person trying to play 5D-chess without even knowing any of the rules of regular chess.
Let that sink in though, 90% of your people own 7% of the stocks.
You forgot to take into account the large percentage that doesn't own any stock.
Open source is much less useful with AI though since you can neither inspect how it works exactly nor modify that one thing that bothers you about the current behavior.