spud

joined 1 year ago
[–] spud 4 points 9 months ago (11 children)

this is based on the poore-nemecek study and should not be regarded as "true". it's "true if they methodology reflects reality" but it does not.

[–] spud 0 points 10 months ago (12 children)

no evidence has been provided though. and your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith.

and I thought you were done.

[–] spud -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I thought you were done

[–] spud 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (14 children)

a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. you are responsible for supporting your own position. I wouldn't ask you to find evidence to support my position. that would be silly.

[–] spud 0 points 10 months ago (18 children)

it's not about whether I agree,it's about whether it shows what is being claimed

[–] spud 1 points 10 months ago (20 children)

no evidence has been provided though

[–] spud 1 points 10 months ago

The same group is also behind the label ‘genocide joe’, and popularized it on their darkweb forums as a meme before it ever made it to X or facebook.

do you have any proof of this?

[–] spud -1 points 1 year ago

according to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in "why kant animals have rights" (2019)

view more: ‹ prev next ›