spidermanchild

joined 10 months ago
[–] spidermanchild 2 points 12 hours ago

Turkeys are super cool, but it's still a bit silly to apply human values to wild animals. Pretty much all animals are wired to survive while expending the least amount of energy and reducing risk to themselves. Stealing catches from other animals is quite common across species because it's easier and safer. The reality is that it's brutal out there. I don't have diminished admiration for a bear because it found some food in a trash can instead of catching fish from a stream.

[–] spidermanchild 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Raptors are awesome and they absolutely hunt and kill other animals. You don't have to make up fake animal facts to dunk on the US.

[–] spidermanchild 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cars checks all the boxes to them - helps with segregation, creates demand for oil, multiple vectors for environmental destruction, weird nostalgia and culture war fodder, another subsidy for rural/suburban voters, and it's the embodiment of not giving a shit about anyone else's and being a big boy. But yeah each of the individual factors boils down to spite.

[–] spidermanchild 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

For now.

In a 2022 analysis, the publication said that, by 2052, half the people at risk of wildfire will live in the South.

https://www.the-independent.com/climate-change/fire-danger-map-season-states-b2695693.html#:~:text=With%20the%20impacts%20of%20human,will%20live%20in%20the%20South.

[–] spidermanchild 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm too stupid, but how was the baseline actually set? The article implies the 2024 consumption sets the baseline, but we probably don't know that value yet and they just talk about how the baseline is higher than 2023 (and "current") usage. Obviously Kigali timelines are slower than we all want, but at the same time having global agreement (mostly, US will probably reneg) and achievable targets may be better than everyone failing (cough Paris). Remember the Montreal protocol is an incredible success story in international cooperation, even if in hindsight it seems like the most basic bare minimum to us today. The problem is the chemical industry is pushing HFOs as HFC replacements, but these are also dogshit because they break down into PFAS.

We need to go straight to natural refrigeratonts. There are many passionate individuals, companies, and policies driving us towarda this and we'll get there. For anyone buying refrigerant containing things, look for R290, R744, R600a if you have a choice when you buy refrigerators, heat pump dryers, heat pumps, cars, etc. This is a big deal!

[–] spidermanchild 1 points 1 week ago

Your experience is fine and I'm not denying it, but none of what you said is unique to Tesla at this point (except possibly some of the software). An Ioniq 5 charges faster, can use the superchargers and EA and everyone else's chargers, rides better, has a heat pump, has better lease deals, etc. You can easily find anecdotes just like yours from former Tesla owners that bought other EVs. Of course you can buy cars that charge slower, or don't have heat pumps, or other features of the Y, but you seem to be just ignoring competing vehicles that do things as well or better than Tesla.

If you're in the EU or have access to Chinese EVs, the competition is even more compelling vs the Tesla offerings.

[–] spidermanchild 2 points 1 week ago

These are some really great points. This to me is a reflection of our (in particular US) view that energy is something unlimited and cheap. The idea that we might simply do less or optimize to anything other than profit is laughable to most folks, so efficiency barely enters the conversation except as a means to profit further in some niche cases after the fact. The organizational changes required to correct the issues you identified seem truly insurmountable, unfortunately, but you're absolutely right.

[–] spidermanchild 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There are tons of Y competitors, just not yet from Lucid. It's the most popular segment with the most competition. Regarding dealers, it's not a universal benefit. Service and location matter. Rivian for example is really struggling with this. And ask the folks that spent $70k on a model Y a few years ago during the peak squeeze how great they feel about totally not paying a dealer markup. Software is interesting, Tesla does a good job at OTA but in general everyone I talk to seems to want less tech, fewer subscriptions, less invasive tracking, and manual buttons. Half the people I know want to just drive old Toyotas because of privacy. The tech stack and the software mean nothing to me personally. I do care about ride quality and road noise, and last time I was in a Tesla both were awful. Most folks charge at home and the supercharger network is less of an advantage every day. The people that need to cannonball run in subzero temps will drive ICE for another 5+ years anyway. Heat pumps are helpful but not that much. When it's actually really cold the COP isn't much better than 1-1.5, and when it's mild and COP improves you don't need much capacity anyway. I remember years ago before Tesla put in heat pumps everyone saying it didn't matter. Sorry for the meandering rant here, the point here is that the Y is by no means a superior vehicle anymore. I personally value nothing that a Y has over an Ioniq 5, and that's even ignoring that Musk is a Nazi that deserves universal boycotting.

[–] spidermanchild 5 points 1 week ago

It's both. Electrified transport and electrified heat are displacing fossil use directly. Global ICE sales peaked in 2017 and appear to be in permanent decline.

What matters is total carbon, and unfortunately 2024 appears to have been another record year. Hopefully 2024 was peak and 2025 is the start of declining carbon. Every other metric is just an interesting part of the overall story.

[–] spidermanchild 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I totally agree with your take other than that their cars are anything special at this point - what features are unmatched by competitors? Yes they were innovative at the time but they currently don't lead in efficiency, range, charging, ride quality, interior quality, and FSD was/is an absolute grift.

[–] spidermanchild 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's fair, I was more referring to the casual internet use so many folks enjoy (YouTube, maps, search for literally everything, all the apps and updates, etc). Denying them revenue through ad blockers and avoiding their direct services gets you pretty close though.

[–] spidermanchild 0 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

How many times did you ping Google servers today? AI bullshit aside, this is still on us for using all of their services. Yes they need to find a way to deliver their services sustainably but it's our job to regulate them and force the issue and not just hope corpos do the right thing (they won't).

view more: next ›