spankinspinach

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] spankinspinach 3 points 7 hours ago

It's a badge of honour, much like Americans getting their first gun. The head detaching process is, surprisingly, painless, but leads to decades of bragging about free healthcare and complaining about Newfies (you know we love you ๐Ÿงก)

[โ€“] spankinspinach 3 points 15 hours ago

Bruh. Whether or not they are Nazi's isn't the crux of the issue. The fact that they are invoking Nazi symbolism and behaviours at all is the issue, and any self-respecting American should take issue with the invocation of something Americans claim they helped destroy (to be clear, fascism and Nazism in WW2).

[โ€“] spankinspinach 1 points 2 days ago

Ah fair I see where you were going. Thanks for clarifying

[โ€“] spankinspinach 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My understanding of NATO's articles is that article 4 guarantees protection against threats to a member nation's sovereignty, and article 5 guarantees military protection in the event of invasion. So it's a direct violation of article 4 from one founding member to another which is... Bad for the whole alliance lol.

I agree it's an insane thing for him to be talking about out of nowhere, but an overtly imperial USA (as opposed to its traditional denial of being an empire) against a close ally is something worth talking about.

[โ€“] spankinspinach 1 points 1 week ago

Pfft, next you're going to be selling me on the idea that we're all made of carbon

[โ€“] spankinspinach 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Great art is often not appreciated in its time

[โ€“] spankinspinach 4 points 1 week ago

You're not alone. Just like with the Goauld!

[โ€“] spankinspinach 5 points 2 weeks ago

Gives new meaning to sleep it off?

[โ€“] spankinspinach 8 points 2 weeks ago

Typical indicators of headlessness may include inability to think clearly, vertigo, deaf- or blindness, and in serious cases, death.

If you think you're experiencing headlnessness, gesture wildly towards the doctor's office to a friend. If you are also experiencing armlessness, please press #2.

[โ€“] spankinspinach 9 points 2 weeks ago

+1 for natural fabrics wherever possible. In my experience, they are almost always better for day to day wear, and I live in a COLD climate

[โ€“] spankinspinach 6 points 2 weeks ago

I want to bandwagon onto this comment, as I fully agree. Buy timeless and good quality clothing.

I'm not overly trendy, but I always dress well. If you're not interested in chasing trends, make it so you can dress well without paying attention. A few high quality t-shirts, several pairs of good (maybe even expensive) jeans and/or chinos, a couple of jackets/blazers to step it up. Some dress shirts and some accessories (belts, shoes, etc). Some of the best pieces I have are old fashions: houndstooth, solid colors, plaids of various styles, and etc.

I would also advocate for supporting sustainable, or at least local, clothing companies as much as possible, but that's a personal value.

Finally, don't chase fashion. I had a modelling coach once who gave me the most important piece of clothing advice I've ever received: it's not what you're wearing, it's how you feel wearing it. If you feel good, you'll stand a little taller, smile a little more easily, and bring your best self to meet the world. I was wearing a $20 Walmart blazer. Just some food for thought. Good luck and have fun with it!

[โ€“] spankinspinach 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You've piqued my interest. I had read about something similar to the lights being piloted in one of the Scandinavian countries. Something to the effect of "using blue hued lights and reducing light pollution with scheduled lighting" was correlated with a reduction in criminal activity in piloted neighborhoods.

Would you happen to know anything about this? I never saw any follow up on it, but as a farm boy that moved into the city I definitely noted a change between dark at night and artificially lit at night

14
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by spankinspinach to c/[email protected]
 

Howdy folks, newbie here :)

I have recently been bitten by the photography bug, and so went shopping (as one does).

What I think I'm looking for is a primarily landscape/slow-moving wildlife camera, that will do double duty as my travel/events camera. I set out with an uninformed budget of approximately 1500 CAD (~1050 USD). I have no real intent of going pro, but want a good camera I can grow into. I had it down to 5 options, in decreasing order of price:

  • Fuji XT-5
  • Fuji XT-50
  • Fuji XT-30 ii
  • Nikon Z fc
  • Olympus OM Mark IV (V?)

(Yes, Fuji's aesthetic speaks to me lol). After discussing with the local camera shop, they recommended the top two, which were the ones that most had my attention but due to price were only mid-range in my purchase list. They had kind off "poo-poo"-ed the other three as going backwards (xt-30), or great cameras but would hit their limits in personal growth or technical ability (Nikon and Olympus).

After handling the two X-Ts, I found the XT-50 too small, even with a handle attachment, as I have fairly large hands. Which kind of leaves me at the XT-5. So, some questions:

a) Is this way too much to spend on a first serious camera? There seem to be mixed comments about this. This is a pricey camera (2800 CAD incl. 16-50mm kit lens, USD 1965 - double my initial budget). It is by all accounts pretty good, with some autofocus issues, e.g. for bird shots - that Fuji claims to be working on addressing. I'm willing to pull the trigger (click the shutter?) if it's worth it, I think - I don't mind spending more once on something that will last me a LONG time. Not really a factor, but this aesthetic has added value of being a show piece - you can have it on the shelf and appreciate that it's pretty.

b) Is ergonomics worth the extra ~300 bucks over the X-T50? On the surface it seems not, but a few have said it can be the difference between enjoying the hobby and letting it sit on the shelf.

c) Re: the autofocus - have any of you with similar cameras had any issues with this?

d) Are there durability issues with cameras, beyond the obvious? Internal components that can break, and etc?

e) Am I nuts? ๐Ÿ˜

I'd be happy to look into some more Canon's, Nikons, and Sony, this is just the grouping that is holding my attention. I know you can get some fabulous cameras for this type of money.

Thanks in advance!

view more: next โ€บ