Imagine a world, where one gets punished for helping dying people.
No need to imagine, we live in that world.
But isn't there any European legislative that could overrule Italian's racist government?
sinkingship
joined 2 years ago
Do you have any numbers or studies to support your claim?
I hear that all the time. I am a doomer and long for meaningful action, even if it makes my life harder.
I don't fly, hardly travel, live very simple without aircon or heating. Don't eat much meat.
I would love to travel. I enjoy driving, I have a thing for combustion engines. I most times sit out the heat and don't even turn on the fan. I like the taste of beef, yet never buy it. I do this despite me believing that it doesn't make much of a difference and it will certainly not save me.
Some rich person will pollute all I save during my life within a few minutes.
For real change, I believe, it must come from politics, not individuals. And forget about company's responsibility, they clearly don't care.
I just don't see this happening. That's why I believe we won't make it.
Yet, this realization has only made me restricting myself harder. Before I believed so, I lead a much more polluting way of life. "'Cause someone will figure it out"
I think like this: Knowing everyone must die one day, still in no way it justifies doing bad.
Und morgen im Bayrischen Rundfunk: Autofahren: "Ein Fehler kann tödlich sein!" Gefolgt am Mittwoch in unserem Mittwoch Spezial: Ausfüllen des Asylantrages: "Ein Fehler kann tödlich sein!"
Dass die Welt vom Axel Springer Verlag nicht neutral berichtet ist mir nicht neu. Da sind schon einige Dinge daneben in diesem Artikel!
Das Titel Bild ist natürlich auch top, da wird irgendein Nazi im Verlag gedacht haben, dass er besonders geschickt ist.
Der Anfang ist auch witzig:
Der erste ernstzunehmende Krieg des Jahrtausends wird weder durch Sanktionen noch mit Drohnen und Raketen entschieden.
Und später wieder:
Der erste ernstzunehmende Krieg des dritten Jahrtausends muss also am Boden ausgetragen werden
Afghanistan, Irak, Bürgerkriege in Syrien und Jemen, Rohingya und etliche weitere Kriege sind oder waren wohl alle nicht ernst zu nehmen!
Solche Angriffe auf städtische Ziele führen unweigerlich zu einem Medienecho von der Stärke eines Blitzkriegs.
Da haben wir aber eine schöne Nazi Anlehnung gefunden.
Bedauerlich war auch, dass die Ukrainer den Kampfwert der riesigen, 66 Tonnen schweren Leopard-Panzer, die sie von den Deutschen erbeten, ja erbettelt und schließlich praktisch eingefordert hatten, stark überschätzt hatten.
Was soll dieser Satz? Zeigen, dass die Ukrainer unfähig sind? Dass Deutsche zu weich sind? Ich weiß es nicht, aber ich finde die Formulierung sehr seltsam.
Es gibt also nur einen Weg nach vorn: den Krieg ernsthaft so zu führen, wie es sich für einen nationalen Befreiungskampf gehört.
Mussten die Soldaten, die bisher ihr Leben an der Front ließen sterben, weil sie den Krieg nicht ernst genug genommen haben? Der Autor scheint überhaupt zu wissen, welche Dinge ernstzunehmend sind und welche nicht.
Man, man, man! Immerhin hat man gleich einmal präventiv hinzugefügt, dass der Autor jüdische Eltern hat. Da kann also gar nichts Rechtes im Artikel sein!
Was für ein dämlicher Artikel!
One of the biggest obstacles to avoiding global climate breakdown is that so many people think there’s nothing we can do about it. They point out that record-breaking heat waves, fires, and storms are already devastating communities and economies throughout the world. And they’ve long been told that temperatures will keep rising for decades to come, no matter how many solar panels replace oil derricks or how many meat-eaters go vegetarian. No wonder they think we’re doomed.
I'm so tired of this bullshit. I am a doomer. I believe that our current society will collapse, rather sooner than later.
Why? Because the consensus is "we can still avoid the worst if we all come together now and work together!". You mean like we did during the global pandemic? The opposite is happening, we are widening our differences and move apart. We fight each other in stupid wars.
I am a doomer. I live a simple life, choose not to fly for holidays, hardly ever drive and avoid things that I believe are bad for climate if I can. If governments would come together to tackle the issue of global warming, I would appreciate it. Even if I would get taxed harder. Or if my food gets rationed. Man, even if I would be called to voluntarily work on a solution. I am longing for action!
I tell you what is one of the biggest obstacles to avoiding climate breakdown: It's the companies, that sow doubt in science. It's politicians that divide the people. It's the climate deniers, who don't want action.
“Summed up, the industry’s treadmill is speeding up and this will make production growth more difficult than it was in the past,”
And I am darn happy about that! Still shamelessly talking about growth, that's just crazy.
I want to know how climatologists recommend dealing with depression.
Since I read this more often recently: I don't think the scientists are the right address for that. Scientists expertise is mostly factual, emotionless calculus and number evaluation. Some might deal with the same fears, just hiding them from the public.
Probably a scientist who has also expertise in psychology would do, though.
But ultimately, I think, the fear's and depression's origin comes from the knowledge that the way we live makes the situation only worse. So the only way to get rid of that conflict in the mind would be a meaningful change in the way we live. As that doesn't seem happen, we can only work to deal with the situation.
Thank you! If you have specific questions, feel free to ask them. If I can't answer, maybe somebody else can. I read a lot about these things, but I am no scientist or expert.
If you want to take an advise: try to ask differently. Maybe it takes more than a single sentence, maybe admit like "I don't understand XY, can someone explain..." or something alike.
Your initial post and the second showed that you don't know but at the same time sounded like you were having doubt in science or didn't take it seriously. As there are plenty of people who doubt science but at the same time are not open to discussion, you might get down votes instead of answers.
Hey, I'm not sure if you're trolling or not, but try to help in case you really seek answers to your questions:
1880 was much cooler than today, globally about 1°C cooler. You'll find plenty of graphs showing the history of global temperatures online and animated videos on YouTube.
There have been times, where Earth has been hotter than today. We know quite a lot about Earth's history, it's astonishing. However, the big problem we are facing today isn't the temperature itself, but the speed of the change happening. When climate changes naturally it takes thousands of years. This allows for many plants and animals to adapt and migrate, not all though. Some are always left behind in this circle of life.
Today's temperature change appears to be faster than anything we see in history, posing the worry that a lot of life forms will not be able to adapt in time. If I recall correctly, today's atmosphere is changing about 200 times faster than it did during the most severe mass extinctions in history we know about and animals go extinct about 1000 times faster than they should in a world without humans.
In today's articles you often see "since 1880". There is older temperature data, both from thermometers as also from other more abstract sources, as for example air bubbles trapped in ice cores give an atmosphere reading of a time long ago etc. However, older measurements are highly localized and don't cover enough places of earth to get a reliable reading of global average temperatures.
It is also possible, that we will see this "measuring starting point" 1880 go back to earlier decades in future, as there are still tons of records that aren't evaluated yet. One example would be the detailed sailing ship logs of previous centuries that cover wide areas of Earth.
Yeah but no. It's fusion power, not fission, so something quite opposite, yet similar.
The vast majority of poor people is born into poverty and homo sapiens is an animal species.
The real reason is that we humans are a very egocentric animal species with little thought to other humans and even less thought to other species.
No, no, I've never said that. I am myself highly worried about many countries going further and further right.
I just thought that maybe there is a either European or international law that prohibits hindering people that help dying people. I'm pretty sure that there used to be a naval code, that sailors must help sailors.
I am not so crazy to think that it would have a high impact, but maybe Europe could threaten cutting financial aid or whatever.
But I see your point. With many countries going racist and with even a European border militia (Frontex), it's probably only in the interest of Europe to look away.