savedbythezsh

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] savedbythezsh 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's what NEET technically means, but it's taken on a greater meaning (especially on 4chan) of "person who lives in their parents basement well past the age it's socially acceptable, has no social skills/is actively antisocial, has poor personal hygiene, and rarely (if ever) leaves the house".

[–] savedbythezsh 6 points 7 months ago

That's how I feel about RuneScape! I don't find it a particularly fun game, but the music is so great and iconic and fits the game so well, I hear it and want to play.

[–] savedbythezsh 13 points 7 months ago

I didn't even know this happened lol

[–] savedbythezsh 4 points 7 months ago

I've never played any others but SR4 is great, super ridiculous

[–] savedbythezsh 8 points 7 months ago

In a world where your IDE and maybe also compiler should warn you about using unicode literals in source code, that's not much of a concern.

VSCode (and I'm sure other modern IDEs, but haven't tested) will call out if you're using a Unicode char that could be confused with a source code symbol (e.g. i and ℹ️, which renders in some fonts as a styled lowercase i without color). I'm sure it does the same on the long equals sign.

Any compiler will complain (usually these days with a decent error message) if someone somehow accidentally inserts an invalid Unicode character instead of typing ==.

[–] savedbythezsh 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah, also a bunch of other details, and the whole plot is way more focused on the war in the movie. In the book it's more of a backdrop. You should give it a read, it's worth it :) I also like her other books!

[–] savedbythezsh 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't know the answer, but happy to see someone talking about this book. I feel like so many people know the movie and have no clue that it's based on the book, nor how much they changed it. I personally love the book and am happy to see it.

[–] savedbythezsh 4 points 8 months ago

That was great, thank you for linking! I expected to just skim it and ended up reading the whole article and the follow-up

[–] savedbythezsh 1 points 8 months ago

These names are really fun! Good ones to add to my list...

[–] savedbythezsh 2 points 8 months ago

I believe publishers are responsible for sales, including what countries it's for sale in. It's not really up to the devs. Not in the games industry though, so could be wrong.

[–] savedbythezsh 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

But a unique identifier in game doesn't actually enforce bans, because what's stopping someone from creating a new one? VS if you create a PSN account, you need some sort of verification (e.g. email address).

They could've done something similar with a non PSN login, though people would've probably still complained. And for them, it's not 3rd party because it's published by Sony IIRC, so it's actually an in house system.

I also don't own the game, but I just wanted to point out the reason in their argument isn't entirely invalid.

[–] savedbythezsh 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

What's stopping you from deleting the game, redownloading it, and setting a new account name? Etc

view more: ‹ prev next ›