Cognitive dissonance 🥱
robinn2
Ugh horrible argument. No, you have to contend with the source I provided, not skip it and provide a different source, especially when the prolewiki page is a challenge to the Wikipedia page, and so citing the latter is like citing a work against which a polemic is directed at the polemic as an "alternative."
Apparently Wikipedia is "not biased", they just forbid certain sources, include U.S. government aligned sources by and large (this article you've cited sources Radio Free Europe, a CIA propaganda outlet; the New York Times summaries of situations in countries the U.S. is opposed to (this is done 10x), despite the source being a rubber stamp for the U.S. government; a Washington Post opinion article which completely obfuscates the nature of the press as a tool of class rule), and so on. Sorry, Wikipedia is biased.
We're out of the echochamber, prove anything I said in this post wrong. You can't do it!
Ugh garbage one-liner. Refute what I have to say or shut the fuck up 🥱
You did the @ wrong lmao
Eh well I did prove they're racist and completely wrong, but good job ignoring all of that.
- Says something incorrect
- Gets well cited rebuttal
- "Omg I won cuz I made you mad"
Classic reactionary tradition, remember there's no accusation I didn't prove. If there is one, show it to me. Instead, you have to resort to inhaling copium about "getting to people." Yeah, racism and misinformation generally aren't tolerated. Sink into that cognitive dissonance like a good little fool.
sorry, racism isn't good