ringwraithfish

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The way I see it: PC has a high upfront cost with minimal maintenance/upgrade cost to continue using it with newer releases for years.

Consoles have a cheaper upfront cost but no maintenance/upgrade. Once it's obsolete (as determined by the industry, not the owner) then you are forced to buy a new console for new releases.

For me, in practice, I know for a fact that I have spent less on my PC components and games than I would if I wanted the same experience on a console.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I've been a PC gamer for 3 decades. Most budget conscious PC gamers I know upgrade individual components as needed. Done this way, you can easily get more for your money than having to buy a new console every cycle.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Holy fuck that's hilarious. I'm definitely going to start slipping this into real life conversations with my ultra conservative family members.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think he's talking about the next Mass Effect game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The game console industry proved this was a viable business plan a couple of decades ago.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They probably realized it's not profitable because 90% of a user's visits are home, work, store... wash rinse repeat day in and day out. They can probably get more meaningful data from the person through their other various tracking methods.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Are ransom attacks on the rise in recent months? Any sites that track these sort of things?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

Good. I hope more forced live service games flop so execs will get it in their heads it's ok not to make a live service game and still make money from it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

How to start a fight with an etymologist...

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Only a matter of time for another Challenger incident to set space exploration back another 20 years.

I think most in society get that human space exploration is extremely risky, but to flirt with that risk with a known variable tipping the scales the wrong way seems like a business decision rather than an engineering one.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They of course me c-level executives, not us plebians who do actual work.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 3 months ago (7 children)

That's the point though, right? It's all publicity. They don't want to give it to someone who may actually use it. Give it to the billionaire who will never use it so.

view more: ‹ prev next ›