It's well put together, I suppose. I'm not going to criticize you for trying to make a successful website or service in this day and age.
I will say that it looks like most of the text content is ai generated, and the authors also are pretty transparently fictitious. I'm not against ai, but you seem to try to hide the fact by possibly misleading your audience in the about section and modeling the site after existing websites with human authors.
If I may recommend something, try to find ways to be more transparent about ai use, and perhaps find novel ways to integrate real time inference into your site.
Oh, I know that most websites are shoveling automated slop. "Real" journalism websites are all in a race to the bottom, burning their credibility as pre-ai publications to publish ai generated content.
I think that emulating that is not a sustainable practice, and Personally, I also use Lemmy to avoid engaging with unlabeled ai generated content.