mnemonicmonkeys

joined 2 years ago
[–] mnemonicmonkeys -2 points 6 days ago

Good riddance imo

[–] mnemonicmonkeys -1 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Honestly at this point those fanbases are allowing companies to expand on anti-consumer practices to a similar degree as sports games. I wouldn't feel bed if they started being left behind as well

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You missed a 'bear' there

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ah, yes. Little Bobby Tables

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 1 points 1 week ago

Yes and no. Chewing cud only involves the first stomach for cows, since they just need to regurgitate it. It doesn't pass to the later stomachs until the grass is sufficiently broken down

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At some point, it you're assuming a single infographic is intended to be followed to the letter in every area across the planet, then that misunderstanding is your fault

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Keep being salty.

No, you just can't read. The original post was talking about having all these things by 33. You saying it's doable over 20 years is completely missing the point. Plus the other commenter's math is 33yo - 20 years of work (claimed by you) = starting career at 13 years old.

At this point you're either being purposely obtuse or you're a complete idiot. Either way: shut the fuck up

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Violence isn't the answer. It's a question, and the answer is "yes".

[–] mnemonicmonkeys -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just tossing an idea out there: what about making the algorithm adjustable by the user? I assume there's differences in which iteration of the Youtube algorithm are preferred by people

[–] mnemonicmonkeys -2 points 1 week ago

Helped my parents clean up their garden in preparation for planting over the weekend. And I'll hopefully be playung Call of Cthulu later

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This needs to be higher up. Enough guys on the internet are going to be creeps that it's something you need to look out for, but that risk gets even higher when they feel entitled to it by paying you for your time.

There are a couple of breadcrumbs in the post that hint that OP's boyfriend might be a bit controlling, but nothing concrete. Personally, I wouldn't feel comfortable dating someone that was actively talking to random guys on the internet for money. And OP's post makes it seem like she keeps going back and forth on whether or not she's okay with accepting money..

Not saying the guy is innocent, but OP also seems like a mess that needs to spend time to work on themselves before trying to date

[–] mnemonicmonkeys 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dude, just stop commenting in this thread. You've had nothing but absolutely shit takes

view more: ‹ prev next ›