I leveled a single DPS class as I went through MSQ. There are others who leveled multiple. It is completely based on personal preference.
I would personally tell you not to feel obligated to level another class.
I leveled a single DPS class as I went through MSQ. There are others who leveled multiple. It is completely based on personal preference.
I would personally tell you not to feel obligated to level another class.
PC only, unfortunately the NDA forbids any public discussion on it.
Jesus. Now I understand why Rocky Linux's path forward looked a little cumbersome.
Thanks for helping me finding that text!
It is still futile, but thinking about it in this term really does leave a very bad taste. Like, I could respect them for saying "we gotta make money so we will only ship source to paying customers." I can't respect them for doing this dirty little trick that doesn't actually work. Makes them look stupid.
I got accepted into Division Heartland closed beta. Gonna be playing that.
Lemmings.
Did RedHat say that? This is a pretty problematic statement so I would really love to see the exact text in which they set their position.
It has been reported that the support contract from RedHat says you can’t redistribute the source you receive as part of being a paid customer and they reserve the right to cancel your support contract.
Where is the report? I mean yeh if that's what RedHat said then they have chosen the path of getting sued to oblivion, but that's not what the initial argument is about, and that's also not what Rocky's new path forward indicates. (https://www.phoronix.com/news/Rocky-Linux-RHEL-Source-Access)
Did RedHat add that restriction? GPL requires source to be distributed along with binary, but the distributor can still decide who to distribute things to. If the only way to access binary is through being a paying customer, I don't see why RedHat can't say only paying customers can get access to source.
What's the GPL violation in that, or did I misunderstand RedHat's new policy?
Rocky has already laid out multiple paths for them to obtain sources. What's the impact?
From day 1 I never understood how could this fundamentally affect anyone. RHEL is under GPL, so worst case you buy a license and viola.
The free as in freedom principle isn't violated. GPL stands. So why all the rage? People call RedHat IBMified, what the hell does it even mean? Has IBM done anything to the community?
Really there is no principle being defended. People's workflow isn't even impacted as it stands, they just have to figure out new paths going forward.
I support Ukraine and I just don't have much of a view of Palestine. Fight me, you can't make me stop supporting Ukraine just because I don't care about Palestine.