leaky_shower_thought

sorry, i also didn't get anything close.

best i can do is bbb.

eff, as has been suggested, is also doing great things, but they're not specifically the watchdog.

i tend to use the pain scale to give me a hint on decisions like this. so i guess the first question to ask before the pain scale is "am i in a state of shock?"

note: i am not in any medical field nor had intensive training.

really scary if he's this left behind in tech and he gets his dictator-in-one-day powers.

the teacher will be fine, if the goal is just lecturing. students, on the other hand, will need more that sheer willpower if they want to absorb anything lectured.

i think the sweet spot should be lesser than 40 as I had my struggles learning in a class of 40ish.

make a fallout shelter and have some isolated communities there live off purely of either one of meta, apple, or alphabet products (or any large enough multinational like nestle).

all for the science of understanding addiction and brand cultism.

sports games, always online games, games with denuvo still on, mmo, party games, shooter games where the main focus is PvP, picture-puzzle games, find-in-picture games, games with 30% or more QTE that is not rhythm games

yes, this method doesn't lose any bits. one of its primary use before was email which was strictly text only.

technically, yes. all unprintable binary can be resolved to 64 printable characters. but that resulting string may not be english or any human language.

a bigger effort is for him to kneel (and get up).

he weighs more than an extra finger would add.

for me, it is a craze because the food is not tested enough for its marketed effects.

sure, many other people also claim to feel its benefits but the numbers just ain't enough, for me at least.

then again, not all people are the same. you can give it a shot for science. nothing wrong with trying.

Most people prefer more fps over image quality, so minor artifacting from DLSS is preferable to the game running much slower with cleaner image quality.

I don't think we're not much different in this portion. AI upscale is passable enough that gamers will choose it. If presented with a better, non-artifacting option, gamers will choose that since the goal is performance and not AI. If the stat is from PS data, and not from a poll, I think it just strengthens that users want performance more.

There will never be a set performance target again.

It's not that there's no set performance target. The difference is merely one, on the CounterStrike era, vs. many, now. Now, there's more performance targets for PC than Counter Strike days. Games just can't keep up. Saying "there will never be a set performance target" is just washing hands when a publishers/ directors won't set directions and priorities which performance point to prioritize.

It might be that your point is optimizing for scalability, and that is fine too.

oh nose