kd637_mi

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I was really confused reading the OP at first, wondering what the problem was, then I realised it was just my Australia brain.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Starship Troopers sequels. Which don't exist, but if they did they would be awful enough to pretend they don't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That's just Irish slang though

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Aren't spell ingredients made meaningless by the focus/holy symbol/whatever that casting classes get automatically? The only time I could see them being needed is if the character loses those items, an NPC without a focus, or a newly multiclassed character.

Personally I would prefer a lower material cost for spells but no focus/holy symbol/whatever. Something that functions more like arrows/crossbow bolts, so different types of magic consume different types of less than common items that can be bought at magic shops or looted of magic using opponents. At least that way you can run out, and the cost can scale in a way that is more intuitive for more powerful spells.

I think some ridiculously poweful spells should still have a high barrier in terms of materials. That way a character's individual quest could be to gather these rare materials that could elevate them to godhood, change something from their past etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Bruh no one on Lemmygrad thinks he is a communist.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You're just as bad as a biblical literalist and you seem like kind of a dick

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Best response. This guy has all the worst aspects of a biblical literalist and just seems like a bit of a dick

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's especially bad with the relatively frequent downtime world has been having

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm in Aus but I have used a VPN to check out Pluto, I saw that there were a couple of Star Trek channels. Didn't realise one was TOS, that's awesome.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm around your age and TOS is my favourite series, although SNW is getting close from what I've seen so far. Glad to see people giving it a watch.

Also Kirk>Picard no question.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is a big issue. I've said it before, but so many people think they know what Kirk and TOS are, and are wrong about it. It isn't pure ham and Kirk sleeping with the galaxy. It's tense, it's deep, it's ahead of its time and ahead of a lot of current shows as well. The chemistry between Kirk, Spock and Bones really shines, and there is a real sense of the unknown. Remember that the reruns of TOS are what drove demand for TNG in the first place.

This isn't to say that people aren't allowed to not like TOS, of course some people won't. I just think people and especially trek fans do themselves a disservice by not giving it a good go.

Standard TOS defence rant over.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Also I'd recommend blocking the lemmit.online instance, it's just bot spam. I block the bot itself so it doesn't worry me but for newer uses it can flood the all feed.

view more: next ›