This kind of problem falls under "communicating badly and acting smug when misunderstood". Use parenthesis and the problem goes away.
jjjalljs
The other day some guy was walking his dog outside in the city. The dog took a shit, and the guy just kept walking. I made eye contact but didn't say anything. Just shook my head and kept walking.
We were heading in the same direction and after a bit I got to my destination and stopped. He stopped a little ahead and let his dog take another shit. He looked back at me and said something like "you wanna pick this one up? Coward."
I don't know but for that moment I was emotionally ready to murder him. He's literally making the world a shittier place, and for nothing. I don't want that kind of selfish shithead just walking around without consequences.
Well, lucky for me I'm not armed and have impulse control. He was bigger than me and I don't know how to fight. I yelled at him that he's a shithead or something inarticulate, and he laughed and kept walking.
Fuck that guy. I hope he gets hit my a truck and bleeds out in a shit filled ditch.
Most email is short. I don't see a need to summarize it. Google is run by idiots and assholes.
If Biden had been up there saying that about a political opponent … it would make headlines all over the world.
It's like the "only Democrats have agency" thing.
When Democrats fuck up we're like wow they really screwed up, look at these bad choices, they're fucked up.
When Republicans fuck up we're just like well yeah that's what they do. You don't get mad at the sun for setting or a fire burning. Sometimes we act like they're just immutable forces of nature instead of human jerks.
We don't really hold Republicans to any standards.
It went basically like any reasonable person expected it to. Unfortunately many people in the US are unreasonable
Oh yeah that's the Peter principle I think. Or closely related.
Someone is good at job A, so they promoted to B. They're good at B, so they get promoted to C. They're kind of bad at C, so they stay there.
Over time, all roles fill up with people who are kind of bad.
I've been stuck on this thought that people making decisions are often idiots.
We're sort of told that management is smart. That big business leaders are visionaries. If someone's the director of engineering they're probably smart right?
No. They're just people. People that have the skills to get promoted, but those aren't the same skills to do anything else.
I think it would matter less if there was more competition and more stakes. If some business puts idiots in charge and the whole company dies, okay. But instead we have Google just shitting the bed for years, and there aren't consequences.
This is a capitalist hell
MacOS by default hides scroll bars. They're big on form over function which I hate.
Some people are just like that.
I knew a couple that mounted their TV in a way that all the ports (eg: HDMI) were inaccessible. They just didn't care that a big chunk of the TV's functionality was now blocked. They didn't want to see wires.
A lot of people making decisions are idiots, or are following the whims of idiots above them.
Back in like 2017 a company I worked for made a mouse tunnel on their web UI. That's where like you mouse over a menu, and that opens a sub menu. You mouse into that sub menu, and another menu opens. If at any point your mouse leaves this area, the whole thing closes. It's shit. It's been a known bad pattern since like the 90s.
Product guy wouldn't listen. Not sure if he didn't care or didn't understand. Either is bad.
This happens all over. People don't care. They don't understand. They don't listen to people that do. They have their own metrics and goals that are disjoint from actual value.
In my last game I sent him back to sanctuary and then could never find him again. I hope he's happy.
(Among my other problems with Fallout4, it really hurts my suspension of disbelief when the dog like facetanks a mininuke and then is just... fine. I tell myself the protagonist is a synth and that's why they're nearly indestructible. Maybe the dog is, too.)
I still have the onyx path WoD 2e books, and I enjoy them. I find it confusing that there several variations of "World of Darkness"
I think "diffciulty" is poorly defined.
The souls games have a kind of difficulty, but I think what throws people is more the change in kind than degree.
The games are largely deterministic. There's little to no random factor.
You level up and improve your numbers, but the difference between starting health and the soft cap is typically a factor of five or less. Compare with like final fantasy where the factor is like 50 (a starting HP of 200 to 9999). Baldur's Gate is typically a factor of ~10. The underlying math in souls games doesn't provide that big of a buttress.
You don't get a lot of super moves as you progress. There are some spells or weapon arts that can be strong with the right build (blasphemous blade!), but nothing really like getting Fireball in DND or Knights of the Round in ff7.
This stuff comes together into an interesting cocktail. The game is mostly about you, the one holding the controller. Your stats and equipment matter, but are secondary. This is very different than like old final fantasies where I can hand you my save and you could win any fight (just do quad magic ultima and mimic).
I think a lot of games try to set up paper tigers for the players. They want the player to feel threatened , without any real danger of losing. Most of the Bethesda games, you might have a scene where there's a death claw or whatever, but you can always pause the game to heal. Most of the final fantasy fights are not a real threat. They wear down your resources, but you're sitting on a stack of healing items.
I think it's also worth noting that the fights also aren't a super long challenge. Most of time, the winning match is over in a few minutes. It's not like an MMO raid that's a 30 minute ordeal.
This isn't my most organized post but I'm on my phone, so editing is hard.