jbrains

joined 1 year ago
[–] jbrains 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ooh! It's a Silvia! It's backwards, but it's a Silvia.

I love my Silvia, but I use Pop!

Oh, and... https://feddit.nu/comment/11221082 ...I have and use an Aeropress.

[–] jbrains 2 points 1 week ago

Aha, yes. Somehow I forgot the difference interpretation for a moment. Oops!

[–] jbrains 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I asked ChatGPT these questions and got sensible answers.

How much more is one half than one third?

[subtraction answer: 1/6 more]

That's one possibility, but what about the other way to interpret that question?

[ratio answer, but expressed as "1.5 times as much" rather than "1/2 more"]

[–] jbrains 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh. I just noticed the extraneous word in the search, which might be throwing off the LLM trying to understand it.

[–] jbrains 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I agree with your assessment regarding the intention of the phrase. We're back at the silly arithmetic meme that hinges on not grouping terms explicitly and watching people yell at each other in the mistaken belief that there's one authoritative interpretation of an ambiguous string of symbols.

Still, the actual mistake remains. Why an extra 1/6 of the pizza? 1/3 of 1/3 is 1/9, not 1/6. That's 1/2 of 1/3.

[–] jbrains 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

There are two meanings being conflated here.

"1/3 more" can mean "+ 1/3" or "* (1 + 1/3)“.

So "1/3 more than 1/3" could be 2/3 or 4/9, but not 1/2.

Instead 1/2 is 1/2 more than 1/3, not 1/3 more. That's the meme I've seen go around recently.

[–] jbrains 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

1/3 more than 1/3 is 4/9. What you wrote is 1/2 more than 1/3, not 1/3 more of it.

[–] jbrains 4 points 1 week ago

What kind of "better" do you have in mind to aim for here? Why do you want that?

[–] jbrains 3 points 1 week ago

Vad sa du?!

ÅH! SÅ MYSIGT OCH HEMTREVLIGT!!

Va fan det där ekot!

[–] jbrains 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a certain amount of Gambler's Fallacy in this, too: I'll keep going, because it's going to turn around.

[–] jbrains 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Demonizing people who disagree with you makes them dig in their heels and elect the dangerous candidate and party, in spite of their best interests. Demonizing those people feels satisfying and necessary in the moment, but it ultimately backfires.

The so-called enlightened people can't be counted on to vote. (I say this as one of those so-called enlightened people, albeit not in your country and therefore unable to shift the balance with you. I vote in every one of my country's elections, I strongly dislike the leader of the party I need to vote defensively for. I do it anyway.)

Until you folks figure these two things out, this is your new reality.

(I don't think you can save many of the extremists, but you folks could relatively easily stop the extremist factory by deploying more strategic compassion. But that's just, like, my opinion, man.)

The System is held together with baling wire and gum. Never forget that.

You will get through this, but you might need help and to help others along the way. I wish you many goods and cheese.

[–] jbrains 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. Watch The Good Place, then ask again.

view more: ‹ prev next ›