jack

joined 2 years ago
[–] jack 1 points 10 months ago

Sigh... unzips

[–] jack -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I don't believe you're engaging in good faith, sorry.

[–] jack 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

That's a fair question. I think I didn't like being accused of doing nothing in 2020. I'm sorry for jumping down your throat, that was over the top.

Can we meet in the middle? I would appreciate an apology for insinuating I'm a party loyalist.

[–] jack 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I never said that and I haven't advocated voting blue at any point here.

You continue to misrepresent my position. Seriously and sincerely go fuck yourself.

[–] jack 1 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Using the outcomes of the primaries to illustrate a point about voter engagement is not the same thing as "defending the 2020 primaries." I really want to give you the benefit of the doubt, but you can't even understand my position.

I won't be goaded into defending candidates, I'm just calling you out for directly supporting voter apathy in this comment chain. By doing so, you do the work of those who would oppress you even further.

[–] jack 4 points 10 months ago (9 children)

I'm not trying to convince you to vote for or against anyone. I don't care if you vote third party, I sometimes do that too. At least they help elevate calls for reforming our voting system.

You have constructed an idea of a person that does not fit what I represent. You are assigning attributes to me that aren't accurate or based on what I've stated.

You are speaking in defense of someone who speaks in support of voter apathy. That's the only thing you've done that merits a response.

[–] jack 2 points 10 months ago (11 children)

It's cute you think I wasn't engaging in that, but go off.

To your point regarding the 2020 primaries, take a look at how they went in States that have the highest levels of voter engagement. It might shock you to learn that when more people vote, we see better outcomes.

Keep poo-pooing the vote. If you won't do the bare fucking minimum, you don't deserve a government that represents you. End of story.

[–] jack 5 points 10 months ago

You're complaining without presenting any alternatives, which is categorically unhelpful.

You're advocating for voter apathy which is supremely regressive.

If voting didn't matter, there wouldn't be such a concerted effort to disenfranchise voters, via the electoral college and otherwise.

You're not convincing me or anyone else here that you've got a sober view on this; it seems like you're hoping that accelerationism towards collapse will net a positive result. Complain all you want about voting and how imperfect it is, your vision of apathy and hopelessness is actively hateful towards anyone who wants a better world.

[–] jack 7 points 10 months ago (15 children)

See Russia for an example as to why voter apathy won't result in the society you want. Propaganda that influences you to not vote at all is probably the most effective with respect to destroying any semblance of representative government.

It's reasonable to be upset at the state of things, but you're abdicating your civic duty for nothing. Do you really believe that will void you of any responsibility for what happens next? It certainly won't help you avoid the consequences.

[–] jack 7 points 10 months ago

Amos Burton calling for the churn? Didn't have that on today's bingo card.

[–] jack 5 points 10 months ago

L is for Linus

🖕 is for NVIDIA

[–] jack 6 points 11 months ago

The most important way BG3 can improve is by fixing the right-click to examine bug.

If you try to examine anything during initiative while another player is selecting a reaction, it breaks examining until the next load screen. Happens nearly every initiative in my four player campaign.

view more: ‹ prev next ›