“It wasn’t illegal” is not an argument against something being morally wrong.

Nah that shit was just funny.

How do you feel now that you’re not smoking? Because I resemble the rest of your post, and I wonder if I’d feel better to give it a rest :p

It’s extremely common to remove attack ads of any kind if something bad happens to your opponent. You might know that if you were an American.

Yes?

The term “distracted driving” refers specifically to the driver not paying attention when they should have been, and not to them being “distracted” by some event that they have to respond to.

Given that the point of lab grown meat is to stand in for butchered meat, I think it’s fair to assume they’ll target the same taste/texture. Honestly, what’s even the point of the discussion without that premise baked in?

You’ll be downvoted again, but it’s more that you’re an ass than your being wrong. I’m going to go out on a limb and guess you were being a dick last time too.

How is this a relevant question? Nobody said anything about some governing body. There have been discussions on many instances about whether to federate with them or not, and it’s accurate to say that some people think we should.

It seems as though nobody in this thread actually read the article. They are not revealing user names on the site. The objection here is having the real name as part of your private profile data, in case of a future data breach. It’s a real concern, but orders of magnitude less serious than what everybody is assuming.

Shame on Ars for the misleading clickbait headline.

I think it’s enough to stop engaging with Reddit, there’s not much point in worrying about what you’ve already posted there imo.

The right response would be to discontinue sending ink, not disable the printer and preventing them from using the ink they already paid for.