icenando

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Thanks! Ridiculous, really...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Non-American here. Can someone explain?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Have fun! I was a bit underwhelming, tbh, but still a must read - most people say it's a classic. I'm just weird.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Great. Hopefully the cunts revving in front of my house will go electric now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This! I have on several occasions considered doing this, sometimes with very strong conviction. I played it out in my head with different levels of success and failures, but never actually actioned it, obviously. I tried rolling my eyes more vigorously but no luck. Good luck OP!

12
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/imageai
 

Hello all. I hope this doesn't break any community rules.

I created this website that uses Marvel's API to retrieve Marvel events descriptions and sends them to Dall-E to create a Caravaggio-style painting based on it.

I hope you like it :) https://caravarvel-ai.vercel.app/

There might still be some rough edges, so please be patient! This is also a one-man fan project (I grew up with Marvel Comics and Caravaggio is one of my favourite painters) with no connection to Marvel other than the use of their (amazing) API.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Imperial football team

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Such a shame... What got me into CoD was the original MW campaign. After that I had to play 2 and 3. Only then o ventured into multiplayer. I haven't really enjoyed any of the other campaigns as much since (with exceptions such as lights out and a couple of the second war ones).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The way that I do that personally is to only read news that link to reputable sources (Associated Press, BBC, Reuters, UN reports, Guardian to an extent etc). These also make mistakes or, at worst, are biased themselves, but they still hold journalistic values.

My reasoning is that hopefully an editor has done the moderation before the article goes out, so that I don't have to. The issue with my approach is that I'm limited to the outlets that I'm familiar with, where there might be others out there that hold the same standards.

It would be good to have a sub to aggregate only reputable news sources.