Which country will be America's trash can?
freeman
joined 2 years ago
Only by not doing them, both the one world government and the language.
A company can't be open source, software can.
Of that software requires significant infrastructure provided by a company you can't rely on the overall service. If not you self host or find community implementations.
There are plenty of untrustworthy Europeans as well, we should not uncritically switch to a European company.
Are they required by law to hold primaries?
Olives, Feta
We have commonly contact with law enforcement when it comes to CSAM, CP or any life threats against a user.
And they ask you to run your investigations? Because your TOS says 'any investigations by either us or by law enforcement authorities'
If you dont want anything to do with lemmy.world, please dont interact with us, you can block our instance on newer lemmy instances in your settings. We can remove your content through a ban + content removal if you want it.
You do not need my consent or any justification to ban me or delete my posts. You can still do that even if I 've never agreed to your TOS, I am not entitled to post on your instance.
It's the fancy legalese claims of me waiving any claims against your that won't hold up.
We included this in our TOS to protect our services, volunteers and its users.
My honest if not friendly advice to protect your services would be to never ever investigate yourself instead of law enforcement as your TOS imply you might. You should also make clear that federated users are not accessing your infrastructure, because you cannot provide any access information to authorities should such a user post illegal content in your instance remotely.
Pseudo-legaleese FUD is not necessarily intended to be used in court (where commonly it would not have a chance).
This is another instance of .world trying to deflect critisism for their choices by invoking "the law". Last time they claimed to have consulted a lawyer.
The problem is not that they can actually "enforce their tos" nor that they can ban you. Its that they try to steer Lemmy as a platform to their preferred directio, this time apparently against teen users, using false pretenses.
Does this include stuff like me waiving any claims against you for any action taken in a investigation by you or law enforcement?
In fact care to explain what sort of actions and investigation lemmy.world envisions performing on users?
yes your instance of your user is subject to our TOS.
I can't make sense of that sentence, I assume you mean users regardless of instance are subject to your TOS if they post in communities in lemmy.world
Which I find bizarre because I am not your user, I have not agreed to your TOS and I am not using your site, API etc deffined
To be clear I am not talking about bans or post deletions, you don't need a TOS or my consent to prevent me posting in your server.
Rather about stuff section 4.2 and the Our Rights sections where users waive you from any claims, the pseudo-legal stuff. By the same logic a user would be subject to any TOS from any instance to whose communities they happen to post at.Obviously Lemmy can't work that way.
They most certainly have this covered in ToS. IP law is not about actual creators' rights.
Not sure since I don't use a VPN. If they assigned a unique public IP per user they could just forward every incoming connection to the user's PC.
If they don't they need to setup some port forwarding rules.
If openVPN leaks IPs that's surely a bug, if it's specific to v6 you can't use openVPN and IPv6 till the bug is fixed
Women around the world probably remember that pi is nowhere near 14,3.