explodicle

joined 1 year ago
[–] explodicle 2 points 3 months ago

Exactly, ask them something like that instead.

[–] explodicle 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's entirely leftist. How does "bottom" differ?

[–] explodicle 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

CEOs get off because of holes in the law all the time. The holes/loopholes/technicalities are part of it.

[–] explodicle 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you guys put us mechanical engineers in charge, we'll give you your physical buttons back.

[–] explodicle 1 points 3 months ago

What amazingly good acts have they done to outweigh their support of such evil? The genocide in Gaza will be completed and climate change will get significantly worse.

[–] explodicle -2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

How are those different?

[–] explodicle 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I should start making inhalers!

[–] explodicle 6 points 3 months ago

Who the fuck, with any level of competence, would ever want to apply for a federal position after seeing this shit show?

People with enough money saved to outlast shitshows, who also intend to accept bribes.

[–] explodicle 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The same reason most of us decline our ample opportunities for sabotage every day. Someone else should do it.

[–] explodicle 4 points 3 months ago (7 children)

It's not perjury because nullification is part of the laws you're upholding.

[–] explodicle 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Any time you simplify someone else's argument to "things you don't like" or "people you like", then you're deliberately ignoring their reasoning for liking/disliking it. Hand waving it away as bonkers feelings is intellectually dishonest.

So in this case, if you like somebody who does the thing, and want anyone who does that to be exempted... then you just want the law to be different. And we have a few ways of accomplishing that.

view more: ‹ prev next ›