It's so annoying how political people are always mad about something. Things are great for us, right bro?
explodicle
Had Kamala Harris won, a peaceful solution would not yet be achieved, but would still be possible.
I can't really prove what would have happened... but that was never going to happen. She was going to keep signing off on weapons shipments and refused to call it genocide.
She wouldn't have supported it as much as Trump. But no way was she in favor of a peaceful solution; she was offering a slower genocide.
We can both do better and expect better.
Great job couches, now your worst enemy is VP-elect.
I thought the people analyzing the election as a single-iteration trolley problem were primarily Harris supporters? [Pull lever] = Harris, [don't pull] = Trump, right?
While establishing actual democracy is absolutely a priority, it's not a guarantee that we would have had a better outcome. Australia has RCV and compulsory voting already, and are trending right anyways.
Not enough guns and flags
Or they don't know that the traps are made by humans.
By tolerating the disease right up until it causes its host to dehumanize other people... and then we act shocked like it's some new, separate disease.
Actually asking, not rhetorical: if poor people are already getting charged based on what they can afford, would this policy exert a downward force on prices?
So way less financing options, slightly more buying outright?
You're failing to grasp the nuance between reluctantly supporting genocide and fully supporting genocide.
Then we never would have heard of them.
That's how Microsoft works. You'll build the work flow now, and then they'll slowly change the default. They will do this with all of their defaults, for a longer time than you will pay attention.