explodicle

[Doctor with stethoscope confusedly swinging a hammer]

Khan wrote this

"Yeah one take is fine, it's probably not going to work anyways."

Although, having to get a transmitter within line-of-sight makes the overall feat more impressive.

We frequently build clear, robust laws around mandatory testing. Like that recent YouTube video where the Tesla crashed through a wall, but with crash test dummies.

I would assume everyone here would agree with that 😘

Those should be an exception, obviously. But in CA we have a big problem with service animal fraud. It's bad for people with disabilities because

• the ones who actually need animals get undue criticism, and

• people with severe dog allergies have elevated exposure.

I think a good solution would be if the service harnesses had a QR code that linked to a state govt website with the animal's picture.

Last week I was walking down the street with my kids, and some loose dog comes running at my youngest. I'm holding both kids' hands, so I kicked at the dog to keep it away without actually hitting the dog.

All of a sudden, its absentee owner comes out of the woodwork to threaten "if you kick my dog I'll kick you!" I just hung on to my kids and kept on walking. I would rather get kicked than let his dog do whatever it was going to do to my kid. I'm not going to stop and get in a fight with this idiot, but it was simply astounding that he expected random people on the street to care more about his dog than he does.

They should simply send their servants to get the food, or decide to have neurotypical children only.

You'd think bitches would like getting humped by dogs.

build, sell and drive

You two don't seem to strongly disagree. The driver is liable but should then sue the builder/seller for "self driving" fraud.

Ok, maybe project managers are good for something.