I really just don’t think our clean air strategy can involve “keep burning shit for energy”. Wind, water, waves, rays, and atoms yes… but not “burn shit”. Even if it’s useful shit to burn, it’s still a huge carbon release.
I just curse out the machine voice with all my pent-up frustration until it sends me to a real person and then it’s easier to be kind to the person who rescued me from robot hell.
I feel seen.
Just Nazi Twitter being Nazi Twitter.
It works until they catch you! Just like lots of other crimes.
The convoluted logic to get from “this is how much money I owe” to “actually, that’s how much they owe ME” is so wild.
“If you're a Twitter diehard who's not willing to swap to X, it might be finally time to ditch X for Mastadon or Threads. On your way out, don't forget to delete your X account.”
Best advice in the article.
That’s a nice way of saying “the kind of censorship that will destroy the internet as we know it”
It’s a closed system. That water comes from somewhere. Forcing rain to feed your crops is going to create a drought for someone else.
Also, their shoes are unnecessarily hideous.
We can only hope.
Carbon credits funnel money to poor people as well as tax exempt status for churches funnels money to poor people. In that, not at all if rich people can help it.