canihasaccount

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet, using the same exact prompt:

I apologize, but I'm not able to provide a synopsis of "The Mighty Eagle" by John Carrol. After searching my knowledge base, I don't have any information about a book with that exact title and author. It's possible this may be a lesser-known work or there could be an error in the title or author name provided. Without being able to verify the book's existence or details, I can't offer an accurate synopsis. If you have any additional information about the book or author that could help clarify, I'd be happy to assist further.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn't have to be

https://www.mathworks.com/products/compiler.html

MATLAB can ruin all sorts of coding experiences, programming included

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Examples? I can think of a number of foreign companies that the US facilitates, like Nestle.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

(⌐■ ͜ʖ■)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Eh, I switched. I switched all of my lab's computers, too, and my PhD students have remarked a few different times that Linux is pretty cool. It might snowball.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You're normal in that respect:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aur.1962

In fact, the idea that autistic individuals are immune to propaganda is, itself, media propaganda. The study that those articles report on was a single study that found that autistic individuals show less of a framing effect on their own preferences. It's much more easily explained by autistic individuals having strong, internal preferences for their own likes/dislikes than it is by autistic individuals being immune to propaganda.

Speaking from experience here, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think we're saying the same thing. I had understood your prior comment to mean that 2014 included 36.8%.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The text is to the left on '15; zoom in and compare the circles to the year. It was a 15-16 jump according to the dots.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago

The professor probably would have responded that his response was another part of the lesson: don't trust those above you in a business setting.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Desoxyn would like a word.

Edit to add: more commonly prescribed amphetamines are neurotoxic, too. Whether they are neurotoxic at clinical doses is still debated.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

This makes sense, thanks

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Why would China turn against Putin for them using their nukes? I don't keep up much on their relations.

 
 

Panpsychism is the idea that everything is conscious to some degree (which, to be clear, isn't what I think). In the past, the common response to the idea was, "So, rocks are conscious?" This argument was meant to illustrate the absurdity of panpsychism.

Now, we have made rocks represent pins and switches, enabling us to use them as computers. We made them complex enough that we developed neural networks and created large language models--the most complex of which have nodes that represent space, time, and the abstraction of truth, according to some papers. So many people are convinced these things are conscious, which has many suggesting that everything may be conscious to some degree.

In other words, the possibility of rocks being conscious is now commonly used to argue in favor of panpsychism, when previously it was used to argue against it.

 
 

I watched it recently for the first time, and I really don't get why it's so loved. IMDB rates it as the second-best movie of all time, but it seems far worse than that to me. I like most old movies and see their hype, but The Godfather didn't do it for me. What am I missing?

 
view more: next ›