btaf45

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Why does Trump hate America and the Free World and want us to fail? Why is a women with purple hair and no relevant background the person Trump trusts the most to safeguard the national security? Why did Hitler's voters think Hitler would make Germany great again instead of turning all of Germany into a big pile of rubble?

 

Stocks nosedived Thursday, sending the S&P 500 back into correction territory and toward its biggest one-day loss since 2020, after President Donald Trump unveiled sweeping tariffs, raising the risk of a global trade war that plunges the economy into a recession.

The broad market index dropped 5%, putting it on track for its worst day since June 2020. The Dow Jones Industrial Average tumbled 1,630 points, or 3.9%. The Nasdaq Composite plummeted nearly 6% for its biggest decline since March 2020. The slide across equities was broad, with decliners at the New York Stock Exchange outnumbering advancers by six to one.

Thursday’s moves sent the S&P 500 to its lowest level since before Trump’s election win in November, and also erased nearly $2 trillion from the index. The benchmark now sits about 12% from its record close touched in February.

 

The Russell 2000 benchmark entered a bear market on Thursday, down more than 20% from the index’s all-time high close in late November 2024. The index’s decline marks the first major U.S. benchmark to reach that territory following a monthlong market sell-off that was accelerated by President Donald Trump’s tariff rollout.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Because the 'DEI program demise' triggered a consumer boycott from minority groups.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

Very possible. Trump Tariffs are bigger than the Smoot Harley Tariffs that triggered the Great Depression from 1929-1941. What finally got us out of that mess was the greatly increased government spending from WWII. All the historical ingredients are in place for a bigger depression than the Great Depression.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

As of right now, the S&P is down 4%, or about $2 trillion in market cap.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

it’s totally imaginary value

That 'totally imaginary value' bought me a new car in January when I was Trump-proofing my life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

As of 8:45 PM ET, Dow Jones futures were down 1.26%

(A) That was a temporary partial recovery. (B) That was Dow Jones, not the S&P. Nobody cares about the Dow Jones. It's not a real stock index.

you’ll get a big number like $2 trillion to make an alarming headline.

The 2 trillion drop from the article represented about 4% of S&P Market Cap. And as of now the S&P is again down 4% percent today. A 4% drop is an alarming headline. And it is only the first day.

Edit:

You were given the earliest notification of the 4% market drop in the entire lemmy/reddit ecosystem right here on [email protected] and you wasted it by pretending it didn't happen.

Now the drop is up to 5% of S&P market cap and 6% of NASDAQ. Did you really think that Trump imposing even larger tariffs than the Smoot Harley tariffs that triggered the 12 year Great Depression wasn't going to affect the stock market?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Apparently $2T is nothing because even my index fund for the S&P 500 went up today.

That price yesterday was determined at market close 4pm EST and before the tariff announcement.

The $2 trillion loss was in futures trading after the market closed yesterday. It represents 4% of the total market cap of the S&P index. As of right now, the S&P is still down 4% for the day.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There is a war … a war against the middle class and poor.

I would like to remind everyone that instead of fighting this class war forever, there is a way for us to figuratively capture Berlin and win the war outright. The way to win the war is to raise the top tax rates on billionaires to either the 91% rate from the 1950s or at least the 70% rate from the 1970s. If the billionaires know that no matter what they do they are always going to have a high tax rate, they aren't going to bother fucking us over on all the class war shit anymore. For one thing they won't have the money to waste on bribing congressmen and right wing Stink Tanks and super pacs and buying up news media.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Then you would owe the IRS interest on the money in the form of a special penalty surcharge on your taxes owed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don’t listen to his dumb announcements … I wait to see what will actually happen as it’s being reported by reputable news sources.

This. Whenever Traitorapist Trump is on TV I turn it off before he gets a full sentence out. Whatever lie Trump tells about any specific thing is totally unimportant. Tomorrow Trump will likely forget whatever lie he told today and tell a new completely contradictory lie after spending all day thinking up the new lie. He can keep that up for days telling a different contradictory lie every day. I will let reputable media tell us what he does but it totally unimportant what he says.

Trump lies practically every word that comes out of his mouth. -Ted Cruz

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Anyone invested in Tesla on either side of the isle is an idiot at this point.

I certainly wouldn't trust their judgement. Musk is a mentally challenged idiot.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Not even that, they’re literally allowed to do insider trading

They are not supposed to.

https://www.ballardspahr.com/insights/alerts-and-articles/2024/10/politician-trading-if-you-cant-stop-them-join-them

[Enacted in April 2012 with bipartisan support, the STOCK Act made clear that members of Congress are prohibited from trading on material, nonpublic information and substantially broadened reporting requirements for U.S. representatives and senators, as well as senior executive branch officials. ]

 

Hillary Clinton on Friday called the Trump administration’s approach to governing both dumb and dangerous in an essay excoriating the Signal chat scandal and the Elon Musk-led mission to slash the federal workforce, and concluding that Trump would make the US “feeble and friendless”.

The former secretary of state and Democratic presidential candidate wrote an op-ed for the New York Times that has been given the headline: “How much dumber will this get?” and opens: “It’s not the hypocrisy that bothers me; it’s the stupidity.”

Clinton starts with the Signal chat group scandal, when Donald Trump’s national security adviser, Mike Waltz, mistakenly added a top US journalist to a small group of government leaders on the encrypted but unclassified app and then the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, proceeded to discuss intricate details of a forthcoming airstrike on Houthi militants in Yemen and report back to the group on the deadly results.

 

Social Security Administration veterans and powerful lobbying groups warn the changes, made at breakneck speed, may even foment more swindling.

The agency's internal documents caution the changes will effectively cut some Americans off from receiving benefits.

Former officials say the changes will overwhelm the agency's already stretched resources, with staffing at a record low and America's aging population rapidly rising.

view more: next ›