biggerbogboy

I'm from Australia and it's been like 8 years since I've manually flushed

Yeah true, I swear at my middle school campus there were like 50+ fights over the 3 years, but at the senior campus, there's only been like 3.

Then my high schools all like "huh, you're gambling. Please continue, sorry for disturbing you." when you're actually gambling.

sybau 🥀🥀

They just gotta bring some loot and the head to the extraction point and she'll be revived, are they stupid?

Not too sure about that, that might be the case but currently, they would need much more training to not mess up facial features, to make images truly lifelike and to follow prompt instructions better.

I've used dalle a fair bit and I came to the conclusion that you will never get a truly accurate representation of a person, such as hair on a bald persons head, stubble turning into a moustache, tons of wrinkles for no reason, etc. It only seems good at generating cartoon characters, even then though, there are still inaccuracies.

I see Saddam Hussein in Rihanna's and I cannot unsee it

And how will this be done? A proper legal system needs impartiality, which an AI still varies as much or more than a human judge. Not to mention, the way it's trained, the training data itself, if there are updates to it or not, how much it thinks, how it orders juries and parties, etc.

If, in theory, we have a perfect AI judge model, how should it be hosted? Self host it? Would be pretty expensive if it needs to be able to keep up. It would have to be re-trained to recognise new legislation or understand removals or amendments of laws. The security of it? If it needs to be swapped out often, it would need internet access to update itself, but that produces risk for cyber attacks, so maybe done through an intranet instead?

This requires a lot of funding, infrastructural changes and tons of maintenance in the best case scenario where the model is perfect and already developed. There would be millions, or ideally, billions in funding to produce anything remotely of quality.

All I see are downsides.

Shits deeper than most English essays

Have you ever generated an image or video with AI before? It seems you are looking through rose tinted glasses, since it cannot create higher quality outputs just by you telling it to.

Not to mention, real animation is done through start and end frames of a specific sequence, then going in between, completing that cycle multiple times until a full animation is made.

AI does it by calculating what's next from the start, so it inherently cannot produce animations that show consistency, let alone even follow deep prompts or a series of edits for image generation, from my experience.

I'd give the generative AI businesses around a decade or more to improve it enough to be a suitable tool for animators, but even then, they still would need to edit it AND cause inconvenience due to not properly animating (using assets, stringing them into an animation through motion and other tweens, and other tools), but just producing a video file.

Jarvis, un-schitzophrenia this greentext

reminds me of my old quora account, I deleted it recently after not using it for 3 years and man, I was pretty cringe back then. I was going through the ordinary 15 year old communist dude phase and man, I had some shit responses and I am glad I changed. It was such a relief to delete that account, since it kept assaulting my email with stuff about genocide, the left rising up and other unwanted stuff like that.