[-] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago

Well for one: most of the things listed already have a solution:

Food? Glassware and Metal containers. Or Even reusable single type plastic containers, like a tupperware.

Sterile medical supplies already are packed in a paper bag. The ones that are in plastic actually aren't.

Medicine can also be packed into glass and metal containers.

Beverages can be put in cans or Reusable Glass bottles or you simply drink tap water. (I know in some countries that's not safe but it should be)

And honestly your cafeteria is the most ridiculous example. Get a dishwasher and use real cutlery. Or bring your own cutlery from home. (Is it actually a cafeteria or just a glorified break room?)

[-] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

Tbh, the only thing that's changed is that the state prosecutor put it on a list of hate speech slogans. Nothing really changed. Hate speech was always illegal in Germany. And you can't really be surprised Pikachu face at the news that German officials are a lot more sensitive against stuff that is actively in use as a rallying frase by actual Terrorists.

But to the Article itself: I don't get the later part of this paragraph, and looks to me almost like ai generated.

The Stuttgart German-Israel Friendship Association claims to be pro-Israel, but receives its funding from the German Foreign Ministry. The lack of independence, critics argue, has turned German-Israel Friendship associations into paper tigers who won’t assertively confront their local, state and federal governments about hardcore pro-Iran and anti-Israel policies.

German-Israel Friendship associations are just that: Associations, not official agency's.

And "hardcore pro-Iran and anti-Israel policies"?????

[-] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

Dagegen mein Gemeinderat (Die kita wird um einen Anbau erweitert): Also da es kein Bebauungsplan gibt muss sich das Gebäude in die Umgebung einfügen. Da wir aber auch das Gremium sind die das entscheidet finden wir natürlich daß es das tut.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

Aka Thighslitting nutcracker.

[-] [email protected] 123 points 11 months ago

Transcription by u/Elnachohat

Transcription if you're having trouble hearing:

(speaker 1, Linus) So we called this meeting because it's come to our attention that we need to have a quick chat about the best way to handle HR related feedback and rumors. We won't be giving any names for what I hope are extraordinarily obvious reasons, but what we can do is give you the following guidelines for problem solving and conflict resolution.

Sorry that this is all boring and corporate, but here we are. Number one, always stand up for what's right. We're only a team as long as we're all working together and working for each other. That's the most important one. Number two, always reflect on your own personal experiences and use your common sense. Few things in life are truly black and white. Number three, always wait to hear both sides of a story before passing your own judgment. Be cautious when you know that one side is bound by legal and ethical disclosure guidelines, when the other is not. Carefully consider what it says about the character of someone who would engage in that type of gossip against someone who has no power to defend themselves.

Number four, always encourage openness and transparency. If you have a problem, you need to speak up. We want to fix it. If you receive feedback about somebody else at this company, the first response is, have you spoken with this person? Followed closely by, you need to speak with this person. We don't solve interpersonal issues here, or really anywhere in your life, if you wish to live in a drama free zone, by engaging in water cooler politicking. So, if for any reason that individual is not comfortable approaching the person they're having a conflict with, we have a chain that they're supposed to follow.

So first, you advise them to take the problem to their manager. Followed by me or Yvonne, followed by our third party HR firm. I hope that you all trust that we're here to make this a safe, fun, and productive workplace, and we won't tolerate mistreatment of any of our team members.

If you have any reason to believe otherwise, then I refer you again to point number four, which is to address the issue with the individual directly, or bring it to me or Yvonne, or bring it to our third party HR firm. Since I'm not at liberty to share any details about what occurred, uh, all I can do is ask that you trust me and Yvonne.

Um, some of you know us very well, I've been here a very long time, um, some of you have not been here for as long, but I like to think that whether you've been here for nine years or nine days, you're here for a reason and you believe that we are utmost to run this company with integrity and compassion.

Um, We can't solve problems we don't know about though, so on that note, I'd like to invite anyone who has concerns about a fellow team member or about a manager to submit their feedback either by speaking with their manager, me or Yvonne directly, or if you would prefer to provide your feedback anonymously, we have an option for that as well.

It's the manager and co worker feedback form. Uh, Yvonne, if you're not aware of it, show of hands who is not aware of it. Hey, a lot of people aren't aware of it. Good, so now we all know. There's an anonymous form, if for whatever reason you're not comfortable, (inaudible) you can talk to me or Yvonne directly about it (inaudible) in the general chat.

It's a safe space to provide us ideas for improvement, or if you're consumed by the holiday spirit and you want to say nice things, you can do that too. Does anybody else have any questions?

Not a single questions? Wow, that must have been a really good speech.

(speaker 2, James)You gonna dance on that table, or just stand on it?

(speaker 1, Linus)That's it! So, um, Yvonne, did you have anything you wanted to add?

(speaker 3, Yvonne)(inaudible) Somebody said (inaudible) if you guys want to sanitize your hands, help yourself with free (inaudible)?

(speaker 1, Linus)Yeah, that was actually just totally random timing. It came up the stairs a moment ago. Dennis is on it. Alright. Thank you everyone. Have a wonderful and, uh, productive rest of your day. And weekend.

EDIT: added who was speaking. Don't know who speaker 2 is.

EDIT 2: I was told Speaker 2 is James

EDIT 3: Ivonne > Yvonne

EDIT 4: "near Yvonne directly" > me or Yvonne directly" and fixed that last thing Yvonne said

335
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

(OP's comment)

I've been in contact with quite a few LMG employees. Many have given me statements about the abuse and sexual harassment Madison endured while working there.

One of them also gave me a recording of this meeting that was never supposed to be released. This is my proof that I have talked to LMG employees and have sources inside. I post this as verification of that fact.

I cannot out these people or give direct quotes out of fear they will suffer consequences, but I hope they come forward publicly even if it means risking their careers.

I can tell you their accounts match hers. And even go into further detail. One person constantly was mentioned more than others, but she's not naming names so I won't either.

She is telling the truth.

This meeting kinda goes along with how she mentioned her being sexually harassed was regarded as he causing drama.

477
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

What started as criticism over errors in recent YouTube videos has escalated into allegations of sexual harassment, prompting the company to hire an outside investigator.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 11 months ago

I honestly fully stand by GN in this and while I think LTT should have had the opportunity to respond to the allegations before the video went live, since this is the proper Journalistic thing to do, it should be considered that ltt has a huge audience and influence in the tech sphere so I can only assume GN didn't want them to get ahead of the curve? It's sad if it has come to this.

I also don't know how exactly ltt could respond to the observations GN made since it's a piece about what happened in videos they posted. They can't really deny what happened. All they could do is lower their head and promise to do better.

[-] [email protected] 119 points 11 months ago

https://linustechtips.com/topic/1526180-gamers-nexus-alleges-lmg-has-insufficient-ethics-and-integrity/page/16/#comment-16078641

Linus's response.

I honestly fully stand by GN in this and while I think LTT should have had the opportunity to respond to the allegations before the video went live, since this is the proper Journalistic thing to do, it should be considered that ltt has a huge audience and influence in the tech sphere so I can only assume GN didn't want them to get ahead of the curve? It's sad if it has come to this.

I also don't know how exactly ltt could respond to the observations GN made since it's a piece about what happened in videos they posted. They can't really deny what happened. All they could do is lower their head and promise to do better.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

I don't get it.

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Apple versucht wie damals Google Street view Bilder zu sammeln.

Hier die E-Mail-Adresse um dein Zeug verpixeln zu lassen. [email protected]

12
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In Schemmerhofen haben die Firmen Liebherr, Wacker Neuson und die Netze BW gezeigt, wie eine Baustelle nur mit elektrisch betriebenen Maschinen aussehen könnte

40
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
16
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
Rechtsbelehrung (feddit.de)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Rechtsbelehrung - Recht, Technik & Gesellschaft: Mastodon-Recht für Instanz-Admins – Nutzungsbedingungen, Datenschutz und Digital Services Act – Rechtsbelehrung 112

Webseite der Episode: https://rechtsbelehrung.com/112-mastodon/

Mediendatei: https://media.blubrry.com/rechtsbelehrung/rechtsbelehrung.com/wp-content/uploads/podcast/rechtsbelehrung112-Mastodon.mp3

23
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Ein mit Biberschwänzen gedecktes Dach + Balkonsolar

7
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

The idea is that every instance is basically responsible for their own users. And beehaw didn't have confidence in the moderation of shit just works and lemmy.world and couldn't keep up with banning them on their side. Thats why they defederated.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Du kleiner...

view more: next ›

bacondragonoverlord

joined 1 year ago