Except the difference is that anyone with a brain can figure out that 5G is just faster internet. Most applications aren’t limited by slow internet speeds. LTE is usually enough.
The AI hype is just different. It’s real in my opinion.
auradragon1
joined 1 year ago
He's probably the best CEO in the US. Built Nvidia from nothing to $1.2 trillion company over ~30 years.
Maybe it's a good video, maybe not. I'm going to downvote due to the obvious clickbait title.
Cinebench
Can we ban reviewers to focus mostly on Cinebench as a general purpose CPU benchmark?
It has its niche. But please. Stop basing CPU performance on Cinebench.
Another political article masquerading as hardware content.
I wish mods can grow some balls and ban all politically motivated articles on this sub.
they should understand that they don't have a product as good as RTX and focus to provide decent low price GPUs with a lot of RAM in the 200-400$ range.
It's easy to explain from a business point of view. The reason AMD doesn't want to compete in the $200-$400 range is because there is barely any profit there. GPUs are huge dies with a lot of memory. They're significantly more expensive than CPUs to manufacture per unit. Therefore, AMD would rather spend all of the TSMC wafers on Epyc chips than $200-$400 GPUs.
Take for example, Navi 32 (7800XT), has 28 billion transistors and sells for $500. That $500 has to include expensive GPDDR RAM, a board, capacitors, and a heatsink.
Conversely, a 64 core Zen2 Epyc has 40 billion transistors and sold for $5000+. No GPDDR RAM needed. No heatsink fan. No board. No capacitors. Just the chip. $5000.
So you tell me what AMD should prioritize making.
Lastly, if AMD starts a price war at the $200 - $400 range, Nvidia will respond with something $250 - $450 but slightly faster. Nvidia isn't just going to let AMD take that market without any resistance.
It should be way more than 4 times more efficient. Especially ST. When running the Geekbench ST test, it averages 0.3w - 5w of power.
Not this shit again.