agamemnonymous

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] agamemnonymous 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I still remember the term "dihedral synchro-helix" from when I got really into non-standard car doors for an afternoon like 20 years ago

[–] agamemnonymous 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Get off it.

[–] agamemnonymous 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] agamemnonymous 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah the move is to be supportive, but follow Adam Savage's policies on gear: start with the cheapest option that's serviceable, and go for the best stuff once the cheap stuff breaks (or you get good enough to justify the good stuff).

I've dabbled in a lot of hobbies and I follow this principle. Sometimes I get bored, and the low investment was well worth the experience of experimenting. Sometimes I keep at it intermittently, but the cheap gear is sufficient for my use. Sometimes I get good enough to justify the upgrade.

[–] agamemnonymous 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Probably made even more difficult by the quotes about how "they're not women's clothes, they're my clothes". I don't exactly keep up with celebrity news, so up until this post Eddie Izzard being resolutely a man who wore makeup and clothes designed for women was my default assumption.

[–] agamemnonymous 13 points 2 weeks ago

I'll be honest, I don't think that jacket is very flattering. I'd probably take that zipper down about halfway to let the lapels lay out, better framing that way.

Waist down slays tho

[–] agamemnonymous 48 points 2 weeks ago

If I had a nickel for every pope elected during my life who looked like Palpatine at some point in his arc, I'd have 2 nickels, which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice.

[–] agamemnonymous 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Still, no evidence has been presented. Only your subjective opinions, presented self-righteously obvious fact. This is severely damaging to your intelligence. Acknowledge it, or acknowledge that a stranger's opinion does not constitute "evidence" by any coherent definition.

Please feel free to consider this interaction more carefully in the future, without the burden of pride forcing some poorly constructed reply

This is excellent advice, I would recommend reflecting upon it.

[–] agamemnonymous 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

You haven't presented any "evidence" to disagree. You've made subjective declarations, treating them as facts. You may be interested to know this severely damages your intelligence. Not that I'm making a moral judgement, but you should acknowledge your damaged intelligence.

[–] agamemnonymous 4 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

There are other forms of judgement than just moral. Subjective proclamations are one.

[–] agamemnonymous 4 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

We've certainly come a long way from "not judging or anything"

[–] agamemnonymous 5 points 2 weeks ago

My party very much enjoys the visual aids I provide. They are one part of a toolbox of resources that contribute to the immersive quality of my campaign.

view more: ‹ prev next ›