Kelly's seat would go to a Dem replacement. They wouldn't have to run for reelection until 2026 in a special election. The seat would be safe for at least 2 years out. Arguably a gamble worth taking to make sure we still have elections come 2026.
Zipitydew
joined 1 year ago
Proposed text lists ETFs as allowed. Which seems fair.
Darn. Wasn't the Economist I was hoping it would be.
They did own Winnie the Pooh until 2 years ago. What a missed opportunity in China.
Polls don't show that at all. Harris isn't ahead in swing states either. Don't start taking a victory.
Israel owns America. Israel is a puppet of the US and follows all US orders.
Which is it? You claim both all the time. They can't both be true.
Bullshit. I subscribe to the idea he's funneling money through the PAC back to Twitter to boost ad buy numbers.
Yeah I want to know specifically about say Ohio, Wisconsin, Arizona, etc. I know Harris will win all along the coasts. But that's only 175 of 270.
I've joked for years drinking diet mnt dew on purpose is a cry for help. This only confirms my position.
I'm thinking about it like this.
Trump wins 2024 - the possibility of no 2026 elections is not insignificant.
Harris/Kelly win 2024 - Moderate risk the Dems lose 1 Senate seat in 2026.
If Kelly being on board helps Harris win swing states I think it's worth it. I'd take the potential risk of a hostile Senate in the future over the impending risk of fascism in a few months.