Varyk

can you provide a source for the affiliation?

his tattoos are of dice and Sigmund Freud by the way, notably not of MS-13, a group to what he has no established connection.

in case you don't know, there is the option under user settings to hide bots.

in about 3 weeks, he's actually going to shout this at somebody.

"a discussion"

whatever you have convinced yourself of, making things up and then asking misleading questions based on your imagination is not a discussion.

not nearly so much as you adore not asking questions and expecting answers.

"your silence is deafening."

I responded to every single comment, even your fabrications and extrapolations, correcting your mistakes every time.

I have no obligation to hold you by the hand here.

if you want an answer, stop whining about how difficult questions are to ask and stop fabricating things.

Respectfully and directly ask a question without misleading disclaimers or insults.

if you just want to keep insulting and attempting to mislead me and rewrite my comments, I'm happy to indefinitely correct you and play the game.

"Do you not have eyes?"

i do, I told you I just made sure the reasoning was still written out and publicly available, which it is.

"structurally identical..."

wow, your structures are identical with or without 20 disclaiming paragraphs of misattribution.

no wonder you have such difficulty asking direct questions.

"literally quoted every time you"

you certainly haven't.

" and you accused me of guessing. "

nobody "accused" you, you said "i have to guess".

and then you guessed.

I pointed out that there is no point in guessing when you can ask direct questions.

"no option but to guess again"

you are incorrect again, you should just try asking.

you got your first answer last time by asking a direct question.

"shouldn't be surprised"

I'm definitely not surprised.

"I go back to the fact that the only things you have mentioned is the fact that it's racist and that it shouldn't be used"

not a fact, although not using a racist cartoon in favor of a not racist cartoon is certainly good reasoning.

the full reasoning is explained above I think twice although I'm going check because it would be really - nope all the comments are still up there; for some reason you're pretending not to see them.

took you nine comments to get there, not three, but good work.

"is your complaint..."

nope, but that doesnt help.

"is this not direct enough"

disclaiming a question with 20 paragraphs of fabrication and misattribution is not "direct enough", no.

"Let me try to find your reasoning."

sure, why not keep guessing instead of asking directly?

working out well for you so far.

"So I see..."

you assume.

"if simply asking if your view is xyz"

you should try this!

maybe without all the misleading disclaimers.

good luck.

"I'm asking what your reasoning is beyond there being some racist episodes"

no you are not.

"so I have to resort to guessing"

no you don't, you can always ask directly rather than attempting to mislead the conversation and my reasoning first.

"hiding the reasoning"

my reasoning is very explicit, specific and publicly available above.

you want to pretend it is not, that's your problem.

"the record straight."

my reasoning is very explicit, specific and publicly available above.

your reading comprehension and fear of asking direct questions is your problem.

"me of making false accusations without actually setting me correct."

this is the proper way to deal with leading questions based on fabrications.

if you want to ask a serious, direct question, try it without fabricating beforehand and then asking leading questions.

dare ya.